The image signifies B. Assigning of Enterprise Role based on users' location. Here's a breakdown, assuming the image depicts a portion of a Saviynt User Update Rule configuration:

Dynamic Variable 'City': The image highlights the use of a dynamic variable called 'city.' This strongly suggests that the rule is using the user's location (city) as a key factor in determining role assignment.

Saviynt's User Update Rules and Dynamic Variables: User Update Rules in Saviynt allow for the use of dynamic variables, which represent user attributes. These variables can be used in conditions and actions within the rule.

Enterprise Role Assignment: The context of the question implies that the rule is assigning an Enterprise Role based on the value of this 'city' variable.

Example: The rule might be configured to assign an Enterprise Role like 'Sydney-Users' to users whose 'city' attribute is 'Sydney.'

Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

A . Assigning of Enterprise Role based on users' department: There's no mention of 'department' in the provided information.

C . Assigning of Enterprise Role based on concatenation of dynamic variable city and Finance: While concatenation is possible in Saviynt, there's no indication that 'Finance' is involved here. The focus seems to be solely on the 'city' variable.

In conclusion: Based on the information given, the image most likely represents a Saviynt User Update Rule that assigns an Enterprise Role based on the user's location, as indicated by the dynamic variable 'city.

To save different settings for various categories of Manager Access Reviews within User Manager Campaigns, a Campaign Owner can create C. Campaign Templates. Here's why:

Saviynt's Campaign Templates: Templates allow you to pre-configure various settings for a campaign and save them as a reusable template. This includes settings related to:

Campaign Scope: Defining which users, applications, or entitlements are included.

Certifier Selection: Specifying the type of certifiers (e.g., Managers, Application Owners).

Scheduling and Notifications: Setting up the campaign schedule and email notifications.

Advanced Configurations: Including filters, risk scores, and other advanced settings.

Multiple Templates for Different Categories: A Campaign Owner can create multiple templates, each tailored to a specific category of Manager Access Review. For example:

Template 1: For high-risk applications, with stricter filters and more frequent reviews.

Template 2: For low-risk applications, with broader scope and less frequent reviews.

Template 3: For specific departments or business units, with customized certifier selection.

Benefits of Using Templates:

Consistency: Ensures that similar types of reviews are conducted consistently.

Efficiency: Saves time by eliminating the need to configure each campaign from scratch.

Reduced Errors: Minimizes the risk of manual configuration errors.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A . Global Configurations: Global configurations apply to all campaigns, not to specific categories of reviews.

B . Campaign Types: Campaign types (e.g., User Manager, Entitlement Owner) define the overall purpose of the campaign, not the specific settings for different categories within a campaign type.

D . Campaign Previews: Previews are for reviewing the campaign data before launch, not for saving different configurations.

In conclusion: Campaign Templates in Saviynt provide a powerful way to save and reuse different configurations for various categories of Manager Access Reviews, promoting consistency, efficiency, and accuracy in the certification process.

In the given scenario, where ABC Company has a one-level workflow with the manager as the sole approver, and Margaret (Edward's manager) raises a request on behalf of Edward, the statement that would be true/applicable is A. Manager's approval is auto-approved. Here's why:

Saviynt's Workflow Configuration: Saviynt allows for the configuration of various workflow scenarios, including auto-approval based on certain conditions.

Self-Approval Prevention/Auto-Approval: A common security best practice is to prevent users from approving their own access requests. However, when a manager requests on behalf of a subordinate, this is considered a delegated request and many organizations find it acceptable to auto-approve since the approval should be implicit in the act of requesting.

Manager Requesting on Behalf: When a manager initiates a request for a subordinate, it's often considered an implicit approval. The manager is essentially saying, 'I approve this access for my team member.'

Saviynt's Default Behavior (Typically): By default, or through common configuration practices, Saviynt is often set up to recognize this scenario and auto-approve the manager's approval step in the workflow. This streamlines the process and avoids unnecessary delays.

Configuration Options: While auto-approval is common, Saviynt's workflow engine is flexible. It's possible to configure it differently, for instance, to still require explicit manager approval even in this scenario. However, this is less typical.

Other Options:

B . Manager's approval is auto-rejected: This is highly unlikely and would defeat the purpose of having a manager initiate the request.

C . Manager must manually approve/reject the request: While possible through configuration, it's not the typical or default behavior in this scenario.

D . None of the above: Option A is the most likely and common outcome.

In summary: In a one-level workflow where the manager is the approver, and the manager requests access on behalf of a subordinate, Saviynt is typically configured to auto-approve the manager's approval step, streamlining the process and reflecting the implicit approval inherent in the manager's action.

The type of Rule that should always be used in conjunction with the Organization object in Saviynt is the B. User Update Rule. Here's the explanation:

Saviynt's Organization Object: The Organization object in Saviynt represents the organizational structure or hierarchy (e.g., departments, locations, cost centers). It's often used to define relationships between users and organizational units.

User Update Rule: This type of rule is designed to automatically update user attributes based on changes in other user attributes or related objects.

Using Organization with User Update Rule: The User Update Rule is frequently used with the Organization object to automate user management based on organizational changes.

Example: You can create a User Update Rule that automatically assigns users to specific roles or groups based on their department (defined in the Organization object). If a user is moved to a different department, the rule will trigger and update their roles or group memberships accordingly.

Dynamic User Management: This combination enables dynamic user management, ensuring that user attributes and access rights are automatically adjusted as users move within the organization.

Other Options:

A . Technical Rule: Technical Rules are more general-purpose and can be used for various tasks, but they are not specifically tied to the Organization object.

C . Scan Rule: Scan Rules are used for data analysis and identifying potential issues, not for updating user attributes based on organizational structure.

D . Request Rule: Request Rules are related to access request workflows, not to automatic user updates.

In essence: The User Update Rule, when used in conjunction with the Organization object, provides a powerful way to automate user management in Saviynt, ensuring that user attributes and access rights are dynamically updated based on changes in the organizational structure.

The bulk operation that is not typically a supported feature in the same way as the others is C. Bulk Approval - Single-click approval for multiple entitlements in a single request. Here's why:

Saviynt's Bulk Operations: Saviynt supports various bulk operations to streamline administration and user experience, especially when dealing with multiple users or requests.

Supported Bulk Operations:

A . Bulk Request Access: Saviynt allows users to request access for multiple users in a single request. This is a common and supported feature.

B . Disabling multiple users and their access: Administrators can disable multiple user accounts and revoke their access in bulk.

D . Deleting multiple users: Saviynt supports the bulk deletion of user accounts.

Bulk Approval - Granularity: While Saviynt supports bulk approvals (approving multiple requests at once), it typically operates at the request level, not at the individual entitlement level within a single request. Approving multiple separate requests in one go is a standard bulk approval action.

Each request (even if it's a bulk request for multiple users or contains multiple entitlements) is usually treated as a single unit for approval.

Approvers typically approve or reject the entire request, not individual entitlements within it.

Security and Control: This approach maintains better control and auditability. Approving each entitlement within a single request individually would require a more complex interface and potentially increase the risk of accidental approvals.

Possible Workarounds:

Separate Requests: To achieve a similar outcome, users could submit separate requests for each entitlement, allowing the approver to approve them individually (and potentially in bulk if they are separate requests).

Custom Workflows: In theory, it might be possible to create highly customized workflows to handle this scenario, but it's not a standard out-of-the-box feature.

In summary: While Saviynt excels at bulk operations for users and requests, single-click approval of individual entitlements within a single request is not a typical supported feature due to the need for granular control and a clear audit trail. Bulk approvals usually apply to entire requests, not to individual entitlements within them.