At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the SAP P_SAPEA_2023 exam questions by SAP. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by SAP in their SAP P_SAPEA_2023 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the SAP P_SAPEA_2023 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Wanderlust's CIO asks you to evaluate the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework. At Wanderlust GmbH a non-SAP EA tool is used, How would you proceed with the request and why? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
When evaluating the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework for Wanderlust GmbH, you should proceed with the following steps:
Which of the following lists of SAP Enterprise Architecture artifacts support making informed Target Application Architecture decisions that are aligned with the strategic direction of a company?
To make informed decisions about the Target Application Architecture that are aligned with the strategic direction of a company, certain artifacts are necessary to ensure that there is a clear connection between the stakeholder needs, business strategy, and the architectural vision. Option A includes a Stakeholder Map, which identifies the key players and their interests; a Business Strategy Map, which outlines the strategic objectives; a Solution Strategy, which details the approach to achieve the objectives through solutions; and an Architecture Roadmap, which lays out the plan to move from the current to the future state. These artifacts together provide a comprehensive view that guides the Target Application Architecture towards aligning with the company's strategic direction.
Enterprise Architecture frameworks and methodologies that outline the use of strategic artifacts in architecture development.
Guidelines on creating architecture roadmaps that align with business strategies.
Why is it useful to create Transition Architectures in the Application Architecture domain?
According to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework, which is a methodology and toolset by the German multinational software company SAP that helps enterprise architects define and implement an architecture strategy for their organizations, Transition Architectures are intermediate states between the Baseline Architecture (the current situation) and the Target Architecture (the desired future state). Transition Architectures describe how to move from one state to another in a feasible and manageable way, taking into account the constraints and dependencies of the project. Transition Architectures are useful for structuring complex application architectures that require multiple changes of existing interdependent applications and/or the rollout of new applications. Some applications/solutions depend on the existence of others, meaning that they cannot be implemented or operated without the presence or functionality of other applications/solutions. For example, a new application that relies on data from an existing application, or an existing application that needs to be integrated with a new application. By creating Transition Architectures, enterprise architects can:
Define and prioritize the sequence and timing of the changes and rollouts that are needed to achieve the Target Architecture.
Identify and mitigate the risks and issues that might arise during the transition process, such as technical, operational, or organizational challenges.
Communicate and align with the stakeholders and sponsors of the project, such as business owners, users, developers, vendors, etc.
Monitor and control the progress and performance of the project, and ensure that it meets the requirements and expectations of the project.
Transition Architectures are useful in the Application Architecture domain because they can help to structure complex application architectures that require multiple changes of existing interdependent applications and/or the rollout of new applications.
In some cases, it may be possible to make changes to existing applications independently of each other. However, in many cases, changes to one application will require changes to other applications. This is because applications often depend on each other for data or functionality.
Transition Architectures can help to identify these dependencies and to plan the changes to the applications in a way that minimizes the impact on the business. They can also help to ensure that the changes are made in a consistent and orderly fashion.
The following are some of the benefits of using Transition Architectures in the Application Architecture domain:
They can help to improve the visibility of complex application architectures.
They can help to identify dependencies between applications.
They can help to plan the changes to applications in a way that minimizes the impact on the business.
They can help to ensure that the changes are made in a consistent and orderly fashion.
Therefore, Transition Architectures can be a valuable tool for managing complex application architectures.
Green Elk & Company is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural and forestry machinery. The former company slogan "Elk always runs" has recently been changed to "Elk feeds the world". One of Green Elk's strategic goals is to increase its revenue in the emerging markets of China, India, and other parts of Asia by 80 % within three years. This requires a new business model that caters to significantly smaller farms with limited budgets. You are the Chief Enterprise Architect and the CIO asks you to assess the now business model for smaller farms with smaller budgets. By applying the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which sequence of steps is best practice?
The Sustainable Business Model Canvas approach for assessing new business models, especially for smaller farms with smaller budgets, starts with understanding the unique value propositions tailored to the needs of small-size farm owners. This is crucial in creating offerings that resonate well with the target market's requirements and constraints. Following this, detailing customer relationships and channels becomes essential in establishing and maintaining a strong connection with the market segment, ensuring the delivery mechanism aligns with their preferences and capabilities. The next step involves identifying the key activities, resources, and partnerships necessary to deliver on the value proposition effectively, which is critical for operational execution and sustainability. Subsequently, defining the revenue streams and cost structure is paramount to ensure financial viability and strategic pricing that aligns with the target market's budgetary limitations. Lastly, delineating the eco-social benefits and costs integrates the broader impact of the business model, aligning with sustainable and ethical business practices, which is increasingly important for modern enterprises. Reference = This sequence is aligned with the methodologies proposed by Alexander Osterwalder in the context of business model development and specifically tailored by SAP for digital business modeling and value engineering within the SAP ecosystem. This approach encompasses strategies for optimizing business processes through value discovery workshops and the application of value management processes across various lifecycle phases (Source: SAP Enterprise Support Services documentation, Digital Business Modelling guidelines, and SAP Value Engineering methodologies).
A custom web application developed with SAPUI5 and running on SAP Business Technology Platform uses large custom data objects deployed in a central data store (SAP HANA Cloud). The solution architect of the application is unsure about which tools to use for integration of this data from different SAP Sources into the central data store and asks you as the Enterprise Architect for guidance. Under which conditions is a data-oriented integration approach (Data Integration) preferable to other integration styles?
A data-oriented integration approach is optimal when dealing with diverse data sources and complex data requirements. This includes scenarios where the data is both structured and unstructured, changes rapidly, and needs significant processing such as cleansing, correlation, and partial recalculation. The advantage of this approach is that it centralizes data handling and transformation logic, allowing for more efficient data processing and integration into a central store like SAP HANA Cloud. Reference = SAP's guidelines on data integration recommend this approach when handling large and complex data sets that require intensive processing and are sourced from a variety of SAP and non-SAP systems. It is supported by SAP's data management and integration tools that are designed to handle such complexity and frequency of change.
