At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam questions by Salesforce. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Salesforce in their Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
What is the most performant out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform to track transaction state in an asynchronously executing long-running process implemented as a Mule application deployed to multiple CloudHub workers?
Correct Answe r: Persistent Object Store
*****************************************
>> Redis distributed cache is performant but NOT out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform
>> File-storage is neither performant nor out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform
>> java.util.WeakHashMap needs a completely custom implementation of cache from scratch using Java code and is limited to the JVM where it is running. Which means the state in the cache is not worker aware when running on multiple workers. This type of cache is local to the worker. So, this is neither out-of-the-box nor worker-aware among multiple workers on cloudhub. https://www.baeldung.com/java-weakhashmap
>> Persistent Object Store is an out-of-the-box solution provided by Anypoint Platform which is performant as well as worker aware among multiple workers running on CloudHub. https://docs.mulesoft.com/object-store/
So, Persistent Object Store is the right answer.
The Line of Business (LoB) of an eCommerce company is requesting a process that sends automated notifications via email every time a new order is processed through the
customer's mobile application or through the internal company's web application. In the future, multiple notification channels may be added: for example, text messages and
push notifications.
What is the most effective API-led connectivity approach for the scenario described above?
In this scenario, the best approach to satisfy the API-led connectivity principles and support future scalability is:
Experience APIs:
Create separate Experience APIs for the web application and the mobile application. This allows each application to have an optimized interface, supporting different needs and potential differences in request/response structures or security configurations.
Process API:
A single Process API can be used to orchestrate the workflow, including retrieving the email template from a database and preparing the email content. By centralizing this logic in the Process layer, we can ensure it is reusable and easily adaptable for different notification channels in the future.
System API:
A System API specifically designed for sending emails (using the Anypoint Connector for Email) abstracts the email-sending functionality from the business logic. This approach ensures that the email-sending function is reusable and scalable, and it can easily be extended or modified if other notification channels (like SMS or push notifications) are added later.
Why Option A is Correct:
This structure aligns with API-led connectivity principles by separating concerns across Experience, Process, and System layers. It provides flexibility for future notification channels and isolates each layer's responsibility, making it easier to maintain and scale.
of Incorrect Options:
Option B lacks a separate System API for sending emails, which goes against the principle of isolating back-end functionality in System APIs.
Option C similarly lacks a dedicated System API, reducing flexibility and reusability.
Option D suggests creating multiple Process APIs for database retrieval, which adds unnecessary complexity and does not adhere to the single-orchestration principle typically followed in API-led design.
Reference
For further guidance on API-led connectivity and the responsibilities of each API layer, refer to MuleSoft's documentation on API-led architecture and design best practices.
What API policy would be LEAST LIKELY used when designing an Experience API that is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application?
Correct Answe r: IP whitelist
*****************************************
>> OAuth 2.0 access token and Client ID enforcement policies are VERY common to apply on Experience APIs as API consumers need to register and access the APIs using one of these mechanisms
>> JSON threat protection is also VERY common policy to apply on Experience APIs to prevent bad or suspicious payloads hitting the API implementations.
>> IP whitelisting policy is usually very common in Process and System APIs to only whitelist the IP range inside the local VPC. But also applied occassionally on some experience APIs where the End User/ API Consumers are FIXED.
>> When we know the API consumers upfront who are going to access certain Experience APIs, then we can request for static IPs from such consumers and whitelist them to prevent anyone else hitting the API.
However, the experience API given in the question/ scenario is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application. Which means, there is no way we can know all possible IPs that are to be whitelisted as mobile phones and tablets can so many in number and any device in the city/state/country/globe.
So, It is very LEAST LIKELY to apply IP Whitelisting on such Experience APIs whose consumers are typically Mobile Phones or Tablets.
Refer to the exhibit.
What is a valid API in the sense of API-led connectivity and application networks?
A) Java RMI over TCP
B) Java RMI over TCP
C) CORBA over HOP
D) XML over UDP
Correct Answe r:XML over HTTP
*****************************************
>>API-led connectivity and Application Networks urge to have the APIs on HTTP based protocols for building most effective APIs and networks on top of them.
>>The HTTP based APIs allow the platform to apply various varities of policies to address many NFRs
>>The HTTP based APIs also allow to implement many standard and effective implementation patterns that adhere to HTTP based w3c rules.
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
What best describes the Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDNs), also known as DNS entries, created when a Mule application is deployed to the CloudHub Shared Worker Cloud?
Correct Answe r: The FQDNs are determined by the application name chosen, IRRESPECTIVE of the region
*****************************************
>> When deploying applications to Shared Worker Cloud, the FQDN are always determined by application name chosen.
>> It does NOT matter what region the app is being deployed to.
>> Although it is fact and true that the generated FQDN will have the region included in it (Ex: exp-salesorder-api.au-s1.cloudhub.io), it does NOT mean that the same name can be used when deploying to another CloudHub region.
>> Application name should be universally unique irrespective of Region and Organization and solely determines the FQDN for Shared Load Balancers.
