At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the SailPoint IdentityIQ-Engineer exam questions by SailPoint. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the SailPoint Certified IdentityIQ Engineer exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by SailPoint in their SailPoint IdentityIQ-Engineer exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their SailPoint Certified IdentityIQ Engineer exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the SailPoint IdentityIQ-Engineer exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Is this statement valid regarding the control and usability of the Debug pages in IdentitylQ?
Solution: The Debug-Logging page does not have to be reloaded when the log4j file is altered while the application server is running.
The statement that the Debug-Logging page does not have to be reloaded when the log4j file is altered while the application server is running is incorrect. In SailPoint IdentityIQ, if you modify the log4j configuration file while the application is running, you generally need to reload the Debug-Logging page to reflect those changes. Without reloading, the page will not display the updated logging configurations, and the changes will not take effect until the application server or the logging system within the server acknowledges those changes.
Therefore, the correct answer is B. No.
Reference: This information is based on the SailPoint IdentityIQ Debugging Guide, which explains the procedures for making and reflecting changes to logging configurations, particularly using the Debug-Logging page.
Assuming that the policy violation owner has the necessary permissions, is this a valid option for the policy violation owner to use when acting on a policy violation of type 'Role SOD Policy?
Solution: Schedule Policy Composition Certification
In SailPoint IdentityIQ, when dealing with a policy violation of the type 'Role Separation of Duties (SOD) Policy,' there are specific actions that the policy violation owner can take. These options typically include:
Mitigate: Applying a mitigating control to the violation.
Remediate: Addressing the violation by removing or altering access.
Accept: Acknowledging the violation without making changes, which usually requires justification.
Forward: Assigning the violation to another individual or group for resolution.
The option 'Schedule Policy Composition Certification' is not a valid action for addressing a Role SOD Policy violation directly. The concept of scheduling a certification is related to periodic review processes, not immediate policy violation handling. Certification campaigns are scheduled and executed to review roles, entitlements, or policies, but this is not an action taken in response to a specific policy violation.
Thus, 'Schedule Policy Composition Certification' is not an appropriate or valid option in this context, and the correct answer is B. No.
Reference: This explanation is corroborated by the SailPoint IdentityIQ Compliance Manager documentation, which outlines the various actions available to policy violation owners when responding to policy violations, including Role SOD policies. The documentation specifies the actions that can be taken, and scheduling a certification is not listed among them in this context.
Is this a default role type that is available in identitylQ?
Solution: Entitlement Role
In SailPoint IdentityIQ, the concept of a 'role' is fundamental to the identity governance framework. The platform supports several default role types that are pre-configured to help organizations manage access effectively. The default role types include:
Business Role: Represents a collection of entitlements necessary for a specific job function within the organization.
IT Role: Aggregates technical entitlements that are typically assigned together, often linked to specific applications or systems.
Application Role: Tied to a specific application, representing roles within that application's context.
Composite Role: A combination of other roles, either business or IT, to form a higher-level role.
The term 'Entitlement Role' is not recognized as a default role type in SailPoint IdentityIQ. While entitlements can be components of roles, 'Entitlement Role' itself is not a predefined role type in the platform. Therefore, the correct answer is B. No.
Reference: This answer is based on the SailPoint IdentityIQ Role Management Guide, which details the standard role types and their usage within the platform. The guide explicitly lists the supported default role types, and 'Entitlement Role' is not among them.
Can the following IdentitylQ object be extended to store client-specific data by updating the corresponding .HBM file?
Solution: Link
In SailPoint IdentityIQ, certain objects, such as the Link object, cannot be directly extended by updating the corresponding .HBM (Hibernate Mapping) file. Modifying or extending core IdentityIQ objects typically requires a deeper level of customization involving the extension of the application schema and possibly custom Java code. The .HBM files are part of IdentityIQ's internal persistence framework, and altering them is not a supported or recommended method for extending objects in a production environment. Customization should instead be done using SailPoint's supported extension points, such as using ManagedAttributes or CustomAttributes within the IdentityIQ application framework. For guidelines on extending IdentityIQ objects, refer to the SailPoint IdentityIQ Customization Guide and best practices documentation.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Is this statement true about identitylQ's syslog event storage?
Solution: To improve security, items logged through syslog are unable to be sent to Log4j.
The statement is false. In SailPoint IdentityIQ, syslog events can indeed be sent to Log4j. The system allows for flexible configuration where logging can be directed to multiple outputs, including both syslog and Log4j. This flexibility enables organizations to route logs according to their needs while maintaining security and compliance.
SailPoint IdentityIQ Logging and Auditing Guide
SailPoint IdentityIQ Administration Guide (Syslog Configuration and Log4j Integration)
