You are troubleshooting a connection which is being passed-through. An in-path rule to optimize it is present, both SteelHeads are working and not in admission control. You examine the logs and find:
[intercept.WARN] asymmetric routing between 10.11.111.19:33262 and 10.11.25.23:5001 detected (no SYN/ACK)
What is the reason for the asymmetry?
After a new physical in-path installation, all applications appear to be slower. Adding a pass-through rule does not seem to fix the problem. Which of the following is the most likely cause of the problem?
-- Exhibit --
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit. In a WCCP environment with R3, SH10 and SH11, the following screenshot shows that the load is not being distributed evenly in between the Steelhead appliances. Why?
How can you provide updates to multiple Steelhead Mobile clients at the same time? (Select 2)
When deploying Interceptor appliances in a parallel cluster what feature must be disabled to ensure packet redirection upon failure?
