Scenario 7: Established in 2005 in Arizona, the US. Hitec is one of The leading online retail companies. It Is especially known for electronic devices, such as televisions, telephones, and laptops. Hitec strives to continually enhance customer satisfaction and optimize its technology platforms and applications. the company's website and mobile application provide a range of features designed to simplify the online shopping experience, including customized product recommendations and a user-friendly search engine. The system enables customers to easily track the progress of their orders made through any of Hitec's platforms, in addition. Hitec employs a comprehensive customer management system to collect and manage customer information, including payment history, order details, and individual preferences.
Recently. Hitec had to deal with a serious cybersecurity incident that resulted in a data breach. Following numerous customer complaints about the malfunctioning of the ordering system. Hitec's engineers initiated an investigation into their network. The investigation unveiled multiple instances of unauthorized access by two distinct attackers. They gamed access sensitive customer information, such as credit card numbers and login credentials. Instead of promptly sharing information about the detected threats with other companies in the cybersecurity alliance and asking for help, Hitec chose to rely solely on its own detection and response capabilities. After resolving the incident, the company publicly acknowledged falling victim to a data breach. However, it refrained from disclosing specific details regarding the impact it had on its customers
Two weeks after the cyberattack, another retail company, Buyent, made an announcement regarding their successful prevention of a similar data breach unlike Hitec. Buyent took a transparent approach by providing detailed insights into the attacker's methods and the step-by-step procedures they employed to mitigate the attack. As both companies were part of the same cybersecurity alliance, Buyent willingly shared the requested information in accordance with their established information sharing and coordination framework, ensuring that any personal data shared was processed in a manner that prevented direct attribution to specific data subjects. This Involved utilizing additional information, which was kepi separately and secured through technical and organizational measures.
To ensure secure transmission. Buyent sent links that required a password for access, protecting the encrypted files sent to Hitec These files included comprehensive guidelines and approaches adopted hy Buyent to effectively detect and respond to cybersecurity events.
Upon careful analysis of the provided Information. Hitec concluded that their previous attack was primarily attributed to weaknesses in their detection capabilities in response. Hitec made strategic changes to their procedures. They implemented the utilization of Darknet as a technical approach to detect suspicious and malicious network activities. Furthermore, Hitec established a new security policy which required regular network and system testing By implementing these controls. Hilec aimed to strengthen Us ability to identify system vulnerabilities and threats, thereby boosting the overall cybersecurity defense.
Lastly, Hitec decided to contract a training provider to conduct cybersecurity training for its employees. They agreed to provide a training session that covered essential cybersecurity practices applicable to all staff, regardless of their roles within the company As the agreed upon training date approached, the training provider requested the necessary documentation from Hitec. Including the cybersecurity policy and specific examples related to the practices or guidelines employed by the company. After Hitec did not deliver the requested resources, the training provider refused to conduct the training session.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Buyent shared detailed Information related to the cyberattack with another retail company. Is this a good practice?
Sharing detailed information about cyberattacks with other organizations is a good practice because it enhances collective cybersecurity awareness and helps in the development of better security practices. This collaborative approach enables organizations to learn from each other's experiences, understand emerging threats, and adopt effective countermeasures. It fosters a proactive security culture where shared knowledge contributes to improved defense mechanisms across the industry. Reference include ISO/IEC 27010, which focuses on information security management for inter-sector and inter-organization communications, and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
Scenario 7: Established in 2005 in Arizona, the US. Hitec is one of The leading online retail companies. It Is especially known for electronic devices, such as televisions, telephones, and laptops. Hitec strives to continually enhance customer satisfaction and optimize its technology platforms and applications. the company's website and mobile application provide a range of features designed to simplify the online shopping experience, including customized product recommendations and a user-friendly search engine. The system enables customers to easily track the progress of their orders made through any of Hitec's platforms, in addition. Hitec employs a comprehensive customer management system to collect and manage customer information, including payment history, order details, and individual preferences.
Recently. Hitec had to deal with a serious cybersecurity incident that resulted in a data breach. Following numerous customer complaints about the malfunctioning of the ordering system. Hitec's engineers initiated an investigation into their network. The investigation unveiled multiple instances of unauthorized access by two distinct attackers. They gamed access sensitive customer information, such as credit card numbers and login credentials. Instead of promptly sharing information about the detected threats with other companies in the cybersecurity alliance and asking for help, Hitec chose to rely solely on its own detection and response capabilities. After resolving the incident, the company publicly acknowledged falling victim to a data breach. However, it refrained from disclosing specific details regarding the impact it had on its customers
Two weeks after the cyberattack, another retail company, Buyent, made an announcement regarding their successful prevention of a similar data breach unlike Hitec. Buyent took a transparent approach by providing detailed insights into the attacker's methods and the step-by-step procedures they employed to mitigate the attack. As both companies were part of the same cybersecurity alliance, Buyent willingly shared the requested information in accordance with their established information sharing and coordination framework, ensuring that any personal data shared was processed in a manner that prevented direct attribution to specific data subjects. This Involved utilizing additional information, which was kepi separately and secured through technical and organizational measures.
To ensure secure transmission. Buyent sent links that required a password for access, protecting the encrypted files sent to Hitec These files included comprehensive guidelines and approaches adopted hy Buyent to effectively detect and respond to cybersecurity events.
Upon careful analysis of the provided Information. Hitec concluded that their previous attack was primarily attributed to weaknesses in their detection capabilities in response. Hitec made strategic changes to their procedures. They implemented the utilization of Darknet as a technical approach to detect suspicious and malicious network activities. Furthermore, Hitec established a new security policy which required regular network and system testing By implementing these controls. Hilec aimed to strengthen Us ability to identify system vulnerabilities and threats, thereby boosting the overall cybersecurity defense.
Lastly, Hitec decided to contract a training provider to conduct cybersecurity training for its employees. They agreed to provide a training session that covered essential cybersecurity practices applicable to all staff, regardless of their roles within the company As the agreed upon training date approached, the training provider requested the necessary documentation from Hitec. Including the cybersecurity policy and specific examples related to the practices or guidelines employed by the company. After Hitec did not deliver the requested resources, the training provider refused to conduct the training session.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What data protection technique did Buyem employ to safeguard personal data while sharing Information with Hitec regarding the cyberattack Refer to scenario 7.
In the scenario, Buyent safeguarded personal data by sharing information in a manner that prevented direct attribution to specific data subjects. This technique is known as pseudonymization, where personal data is processed in such a way that it cannot be attributed to a specific individual without the use of additional information. Pseudonymization helps protect privacy while still allowing data to be useful for analysis and processing. This approach is recommended by regulations such as the GDPR and ISO/IEC 27018 for the protection of personal data in cloud environments.
Scenario 8: FindaxLabs is a financial institution that offers money transfers services globally The company Is known for quick money transfers at a low cost. To transfer money, users register with their email addresses and submit a photo of their ID card for identity verification. They also need to provide the recipient s bank account details alongside their own bank account details. Users can track the transfer through their accounts, either from the website or mobile app. As the company operates in a highly sensitive industry, it recognizes the importance of ensuring cybersecurity. As such, FindaxLabs has addressed its cybersecurity concerns through its business continuity plan.
Nevertheless, a few months ago, FindaxLabs detected suspicious activity on its network and realized that it was being attacked The attackers tried to gain access to customer information. Including emails, bank account numbers, and records of financial transactions. Upon receiving the alert, the incident response team responded swiftly Following the ICT readiness for business continuity (IRBC) policy and procedures, they immediately took down the communication channels to the server and went offline. Subsequently, they conducted vulnerability testing and network scanning, but did not identify any other backdoors. After dodging this attack, the company completely changed its approach toward cyber threats. Consequently, cybersecurity became one of their highest priorities.
FindaxLabs established a more comprehensive cybersecurity incident management plan based on its cybersecurity Incident management policy 10 effectively handle and mitigate future incidents and vulnerabilities. The cybersecurity incident management plan outlined a structured approach based on industry best practices and included various phases of the incident response process
The company also created a post-incident report to evaluate the effectiveness of their response capabilities and identify areas for improvement It documented all relevant information related to the incident, such as category, priority, status, and actions taken to resolve it Based on this documentation, it defined the IRBC activities that helped them respond to and recover from disruptions, creating an IRBC timeline. The timeline consisted of three main stages: incident detection, response, and recovery. The company evaluated whether IRBC objectives were met for each phase. Through this evaluation, they determined that improved collaboration between business managers and ICT staff, as well as the implementation of preventive measures such as antivirus and firewalls, would have provided layered protection and better integration of cybersecurity into the business continuity strategy.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which element of ICT readiness for business continuity did FindaxLabs consider after detecting the incident?
After detecting the incident, FindaxLabs considered the technology aspect of ICT readiness for business continuity. This included conducting vulnerability testing and network scanning to identify potential weaknesses in their software and ICT resources. By focusing on technology, they aimed to enhance their detection capabilities and prevent future breaches. The emphasis on technology aligns with the guidelines provided in ISO/IEC 27031, which addresses ICT readiness for business continuity and highlights the importance of maintaining and securing ICT infrastructure and applications.
Among others, what should be done 10 mitigate disinformation and misinformation?
To mitigate disinformation and misinformation, promoting modern media literacy is essential. Educating individuals on how to critically evaluate information sources and recognize false information can significantly reduce the spread of misinformation. This approach empowers people to make informed decisions and enhances overall societal resilience against disinformation.
ISO/IEC 27032:2012 - Provides guidelines for improving cybersecurity, including the importance of addressing social engineering and misinformation.
NIST SP 800-150 - Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing, which highlights the role of education and awareness in combating misinformation and disinformation.
Which of the following activities does not ensure the ongoing security of an Intrusion Detection System (IDS)?
Reporting IDS alerts of malicious transactions to interested parties does not ensure the ongoing security of an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). While it is important for situational awareness and incident response, it does not directly contribute to the security and maintenance of the IDS itself. Ensuring ongoing security of an IDS involves activities such as encrypting IDS management communications and creating unique user and administrator accounts for every IDS system, which help protect the IDS from being compromised. Reference include NIST SP 800-94, which provides guidelines for securing IDS systems.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
