At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam questions by PECB. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by PECB in their PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Scenario 1
The risk assessment process was led by Henry, Bontton's risk manager. The first step that Henry took was identifying the company's assets. Afterward, Henry created various potential incident scenarios. One of the main concerns regarding the use of the application was the possibility of being targeted by cyber attackers, as a great number of organizations were experiencing cyberattacks during that time. After analyzing the identified risks, Henry evaluated them and concluded that new controls must be implemented if the company wants to use the application. Among others, he stated that training should be provided to personnel regarding the use of the application and that awareness sessions should be conducted regarding the importance of protecting customers' personal data.
Lastly, Henry communicated the risk assessment results to the top management. They decided that the application will be used only after treating the identified risks.
Henry concluded that one of the main concerns regarding the use of the application for online ordering was cyberattacks. What did Henry identify in this case? Refer to scenario 1.\
In this scenario, Henry identifies 'cyberattacks' as one of the main concerns related to the use of the application for online ordering. According to ISO/IEC 27005, a 'threat' is any potential cause of an unwanted incident that may result in harm to a system or organization. In this context, cyberattacks are considered a threat because they represent a potential cause that could compromise the security of the application. Henry's identification of cyberattacks as a primary concern aligns with recognizing a specific threat that could exploit vulnerabilities within the system.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.3, 'Threat identification,' which provides guidance on identifying threats that could affect the organization's information assets.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 6.1.2, 'Information Security Risk Assessment,' where identifying threats is part of the risk assessment process.
These answers are verified based on the standards' definitions and guidelines, providing a comprehensive understanding of how ISO/IEC 27005 is used within the context of ISO/IEC 27001.
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
According to the risk assessment methodology used by Biotide, what else should be performed during activity area 4? Refer to scenario 8.
In Activity Area 4 of the risk assessment methodology used by Biotide, the focus is on identifying and evaluating risks, reviewing the criteria defined in Activity Area 1, and evaluating the consequences of identified areas of concern to determine the level of risk. However, an essential part of completing a risk assessment process also includes determining appropriate mitigation strategies for the identified risks.
ISO/IEC 27005 provides guidance on selecting and implementing security measures to manage the risk to an acceptable level. Therefore, selecting a mitigation strategy for the identified risk profiles is a crucial next step. This involves deciding on controls or measures that will reduce either the likelihood of the threat exploiting the vulnerability or the impact of the risk should it occur. Thus, the correct answer is B.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Section 8.3.5 'Risk treatment' outlines the process of selecting appropriate risk treatment options (mitigation strategies) once risks have been identified and evaluated.
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri
a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Based on scenario 3, Printary used a list of identified events that could negatively influence the achievement of its information security objectives to identify information security risks. Is this in compliance with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005?
According to ISO/IEC 27005, identifying risks to information security involves recognizing events that could adversely affect the achievement of information security objectives. Using a list of events that could negatively impact these objectives is consistent with the risk identification process as outlined in ISO/IEC 27005. This approach focuses on identifying specific incidents or events that could result in security breaches or compromises, providing a clear understanding of the potential risks to the organization. Thus, Printary's use of a list of such events to identify information security risks complies with the standard's guidelines, making option B the correct answer.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.2, 'Risk Identification,' which states that the organization should identify the events that could compromise information security objectives.
What are opportunities?
Opportunities, according to ISO standards such as ISO 31000, are situations or conditions that have the potential to provide a favorable impact on achieving objectives. They represent circumstances that, when leveraged, can lead to beneficial outcomes for the organization, such as competitive advantage, growth, or improved performance. Option B is correct as it accurately describes opportunities as circumstances expected to be favorable to achieving objectives. Option A (Occurrence or change of a particular set of circumstances) is a more general definition that could apply to both risks and opportunities, while Option C (Outcome of an event affecting objectives) is more aligned with the concept of risk.
According to CRAMM methodology, how is risk assessment initiated?
According to the CRAMM (CCTA Risk Analysis and Management Method) methodology, risk assessment begins by collecting detailed information on the system and identifying all assets that fall within the defined scope. This foundational step ensures that the assessment is comprehensive and includes all relevant assets, which could be potential targets for risk. This makes option A the correct answer.
