At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions by PECB. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by PECB in their PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Scenario 1:
HealthGenic is a leading multi-specialty healthcare organization providing patients with comprehensive medical services in Toronto, Canad
a. The organization relies heavily on a web-based medical software platform to monitor patient health, schedule appointments, generate customized medical reports, securely store patient data, and facilitate seamless communication among various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, and medical laboratory staff.
As the organization expanded its services and demand grew, frequent and prolonged service interruptions became more common, causing significant disruptions to patient care and administrative processes. As such, HealthGenic initiated a comprehensive risk analysis to assess the severity of risks it faced.
When comparing the risk analysis results with its risk criteria to determine whether the risk and its significance were acceptable or tolerable, HealthGenic noticed a critical gap in its capacity planning and infrastructure resilience. Recognizing the urgency of this issue, HealthGenic reached out to the software development company responsible for its platform. Utilizing its expertise in healthcare technology, data management, and compliance regulations, the software development company successfully resolved the service interruptions.
However, HealthGenic also uncovered unauthorized changes to user access controls. Consequently, some medical reports were altered, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records. The company swiftly acknowledged and corrected the unintentional changes to user access controls. When analyzing the root cause of these changes, HealthGenic identified a vulnerability related to the segregation of duties within the IT department, which allowed individuals with system administration access also to manage user access controls. Therefore, HealthGenic decided to prioritize controls related to organizational structure, including segregation of duties, job rotations, job descriptions, and approval processes.
In response to the consequences of the service interruptions, the software development company revamped its infrastructure by adopting a scalable architecture hosted on a cloud platform, enabling dynamic resource allocation based on demand. Rigorous load testing and performance optimization were conducted to identify and address potential bottlenecks, ensuring the system could handle increased user loads seamlessly. Additionally, the company promptly assessed the unauthorized access and data alterations.
To ensure that all employees, including interns, are aware of the importance of data security and the proper handling of patient information, HealthGenic included controls tailored to specifically address employee training, management reviews, and internal audits. Additionally, given the sensitivity of patient data, HealthGenic implemented strict confidentiality measures, including robust authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication.
In response to the challenges faced by HealthGenic, the organization recognized the vital importance of ensuring a secure cloud computing environment. It initiated a comprehensive self-assessment specifically tailored to evaluate and enhance the security of its cloud infrastructure and practices.
Based on scenario 1, what type of controls did HealthGenic decide to prioritize?
An organization has decided to conduct information security awareness and training sessions on a monthly basis for all employees. Only 45% of employees who attended these sessions were able to pass the exam. What does the percentage represent?
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, a performance indicator is ''a metric that provides information about the effectiveness or efficiency of an activity, process, system or organization'' (section 3.35). A performance indicator should be measurable, relevant, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART). In this case, the percentage of employees who passed the exam is a performance indicator that measures the effectiveness of the information security awareness and training sessions. It shows how well the sessions achieved their intended learning outcomes and how well the employees understood the information security concepts and practices.
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit
Scenario 5: Operaze is a small software development company that develops applications for various companies around the world. Recently, the company conducted a risk assessment to assess the information security risks that could arise from operating in a digital landscape. Using different testing methods, including penetration Resting and code review, the company identified some issues in its ICT systems, including improper user permissions, misconfigured security settings, and insecure network configurations. To resolve these issues and enhance information security, Operaze decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001.
Considering that Operaze is a small company, the entire IT team was involved in the ISMS implementation project. Initially, the company analyzed the business requirements and the internal and external environment, identified its key processes and activities, and identified and analyzed the interested parties In addition, the top management of Operaze decided to Include most of the company's departments within the ISMS scope. The defined scope included the organizational and physical boundaries. The IT team drafted an information security policy and communicated it to all relevant interested parties In addition, other specific policies were developed to elaborate on security issues and the roles and responsibilities were assigned to all interested parties.
Following that, the HR manager claimed that the paperwork created by ISMS does not justify its value and the implementation of the ISMS should be canceled However, the top management determined that this claim was invalid and organized an awareness session to explain the benefits of the ISMS to all interested parties.
Operaze decided to migrate Its physical servers to their virtual servers on third-party infrastructure. The new cloud computing solution brought additional changes to the company Operaze's top management, on the other hand, aimed to not only implement an effective ISMS but also ensure the smooth running of the ISMS operations. In this situation, Operaze's top management concluded that the services of external experts were required to implement their information security strategies. The IT team, on the other hand, decided to initiate a change in the ISMS scope and implemented the required modifications to the processes of the company.
Based on scenario 5. in which category of the interested parties does the MR manager of Operaze belong?
According to ISO/IEC 27001, interested parties are those who can affect, be affected by, or perceive themselves to be affected by the organization's information security activities, products, or services. Interested parties can be classified into four categories based on their influence and interest in the ISMS:
Positively influenced interested parties: those who benefit from the ISMS and support its implementation and operation
Negatively influenced interested parties: those who are adversely affected by the ISMS and oppose its implementation and operation
High-interest interested parties: those who have a strong interest in the ISMS and its outcomes, regardless of their influence
Low-interest interested parties: those who have a weak interest in the ISMS and its outcomes, regardless of their influence
In scenario 5, the HR manager of Operaze belongs to the category of negatively influenced interested parties, because he/she perceives that the ISMS will create more paperwork and documentation for the HR Department, and therefore opposes its implementation and operation. The HR manager does not benefit from the ISMS and does not support its objectives and requirements.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clause 4.2: Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Annex A.18.1.4: Assessment of and decision on information security events
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 2: Introduction to Information Security Management System (ISMS) concepts as required by ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 4: Planning the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 6: Implementing the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 7: Performance evaluation, monitoring and measurement of the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 8: Continual improvement of the ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Preparing for the ISMS certification audit
The incident management process of an organization enables them to prepare for and respond to information security incidents. In addition, the organization has procedures in place for assessing information security events. According to ISO/IEC 27001, what else must an incident management process include?
According to ISO/IEC 27001, an incident management process must include processes for using knowledge gained from information security incidents to reduce the likelihood or impact of future incidents, and to improve the overall level of information security. This means that the organization should conduct a root cause analysis of the incidents, identify the lessons learned, and implement corrective actions to prevent recurrence or mitigate consequences. The organization should also document and communicate the results of the incident management process to relevant stakeholders, and update the risk assessment and treatment plan accordingly. (Must be taken from ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer resources)
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A.16 Information security incident management
ISO/IEC TS 27022:2021, clause 7.5.3.16 Information security incident management process
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Incident Management
Questio n:
Which statement regarding organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities is NOT correct?
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 5.3 -- Organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities clearly states:
'Top management shall assign the responsibility and authority for:
a) ensuring that the ISMS conforms to the requirements of this document;
b) reporting on the performance of the ISMS to top management.'
This means top management is not solely responsible for directly reporting on performance---it can assign this responsibility to a qualified individual (such as an ISMS manager, CISO, or another responsible party). Therefore, Option A is incorrect and violates the intent of Clause 5.3.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 5.3
