At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam questions by PECB. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by PECB in their PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
You are a member of the audit team of a second-party audit of an organisation with 625 employees. The audit procedure recommends using sampling criteria which requires the review of the documented competence for 25 personnel. The audit team leader developed an audit plan allocating one hour to audit the Human Resources department (from 11:30 am to 12:30 pm). She told you that she could not allocate any additional time.
What would you do?
In this scenario, the time allocated by the audit team leader for the Human Resources audit is fixed, and as an auditor, you must work within that constraint. Although the sampling criteria suggests reviewing 25 personnel files, it is acceptable to adjust the sample size based on time and resource limitations. ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes risk-based thinking and practical resource management (Clause 7.1), so it is reasonable to review a smaller sample if the time is insufficient.
Option B is a pragmatic approach, allowing you to focus on quality over quantity by reviewing as many cases as time allows without compromising the audit schedule.
Options like extending the audit (A, C, D) are impractical in a structured audit environment, especially for second-party audits where maintaining the agreed schedule is important.
You, as auditor, are in dialogue with the quality lead and managing director of a small business that supplies specialist
laboratory equipment and furniture.
You: "I'd like to look at how you manage change in the organisation. What changes have you made as a business, say,
over the last 12 months?"
Auditee: "We have made some strategic changes, the main one being that we no longer manufacture our own products
in house."
You: "That sounds like quite a significant change. What has been the impact of that?"
Auditee: "We now mainly sell other manufacturers' products, under their brand names, and have outsourced
manufacture of our own brand products to one of our suppliers. Unfortunately, we had to make six members of our staff
redundant. This represents about 20% of our workforce, so this has been quite a challenging time."
This scenario presents a number of audit trails to different ISO 9001 requirements.
Which three of the following requirements would be relevant audit trails for this scenario?
B . Control of externally provided processes, products, and services: This is relevant because the organization has outsourced the manufacture of its own brand products to a supplier. According to ISO 9001, the organization must ensure that externally provided processes remain within the control of its quality management system.
C . Design and development of products and services: Even though the organization no longer manufactures in-house, it still needs to control the design and development of its products, especially since they are now being produced by an external provider.
F . Organisation roles and responsibilities: The change in strategy has led to a significant reduction in staff, which would have an impact on the roles and responsibilities within the organization. It is important to audit how these changes have been managed and communicated within the organization to ensure continued effectiveness of the quality management system.
These audit trails are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes the importance of controlling externally provided processes and products, managing design and development, and clearly defining roles and responsibilities within the quality management system.
An audit team of three people is conducting a Stage 2 audit to ISO 9001 of an engineering organisation which manufactures sacrificial anodes for the
oil and gas industry in marine environments. These are aluminium products designed to prevent corrosion of submerged steel structures. As one of
the auditors, you find that the organisation has shipped anodes for Project DK in the Gulf of Mexico before the galvanic efficiency test results for the
anodes have been fully analysed and reported as required by the customer. The Quality Manager explains that the Managing Director authorised the
release of the anodes to avoid late delivery as penalties would be imposed. The customer was not informed since the tests rarely fall below the
required efficiency. You raise a nonconformity against clause 8.6 of ISO 9001.
During the audit team meeting in preparation for the Closing meeting, the second auditor disagreed with the clause of ISO 9001 selected for the
above nonconformity. He thinks it should be clause 9.1.1.
Choose three options for how the audit team leader should best respond to the situation:
As the audit team leader, it is crucial to manage differing opinions constructively and ensure that the correct clause is selected for the nonconformity based on solid evidence. Here's how the situation should be handled:
E . Invite you and the second auditor to fully explain your point of view and then decide which clause to select: This promotes collaboration and transparency, allowing both auditors to present their rationale for choosing the specific clause.
F Review the evidence with you and the second auditor, and then decide which clause of ISO 9001 would best apply: Reviewing the evidence in relation to the specific requirements of ISO 9001 is essential for determining which clause is most appropriate.
H . Try to obtain a consensus between you and the second auditor after a discussion of the different opinions: Consensus-building is a crucial skill for an audit team leader. Achieving agreement ensures the nonconformity is addressed accurately and with full team support.
Options such as overruling immediately (D) or deferring the decision without full discussion (B) could undermine team dynamics and the audit process. Consulting the quality manager (A) or selecting an entirely different clause (G) is unnecessary, as the team should resolve the issue internally.
XYZ Corporation is an organisation that employs 100 people. As the audit team leader, you conduct a certification audit at Stage 1. When reviewing the quality management system (QMS), you find that the objectives have been defined by an external consultant using those of a competitor, but nothing is documented. The Quality Manager complains that this has created a lot of resistance to the QMS, and the Chief Executive is asking questions about how much it will cost.
Which two options describe the circumstances in which you could raise a nonconformity against clause 6.2 of ISO 9001?
According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 6.2.1, the organization is required to establish quality objectives at relevant functions, levels, and processes for the quality management system (QMS). The quality objectives must be consistent with the quality policy, measurable, monitored, communicated, and updated as appropriate. The organization is also required to maintain documented information on the quality objectives, as per clause 7.5.1.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the quality objectives defined by the external consultant are not in alignment with the organization's quality policy, as they are based on those of a competitor, rather than the organization's own purpose, strategic direction, and customer requirements. This creates a mismatch between the organization's vision and goals, and the quality objectives that are supposed to guide and measure the QMS performance. Moreover, the quality objectives are not maintained as documented information, which makes it difficult to communicate, monitor, and update them, as well as to demonstrate evidence of their implementation and achievement.
Hence, the circumstances in which a nonconformity against clause 6.2 of ISO 9001 could be raised are B and C, as they indicate a failure to comply with the requirements of clause 6.2.1. The other options are either irrelevant or not directly related to clause 6.2, as they do not pertain to the establishment and documentation of quality objectives.
ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems --- Requirements, clause 6.2.1 and 7.5.1
ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.4 and 6.7.2
ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section ''Learning objectives''
ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6
Even though past audits have highlighted a consistently large number of nonconformities within an organisation's design team, the organisation has not varied the frequency or duration of audits on its audit plan.
The decision for whether this situation is acceptable or not should be governed by which of the following?
