At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam questions by Palo Alto Networks. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Palo Alto Networks in their Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
A company has created a custom application that collects URLs from various websites and then lists bad sites. They want to update a custom URL category on the firewall with the URLs collected.
Which tool can automate these updates?
The scenario describes a need for programmatic and automated updating of a custom URL category on a Palo Alto Networks firewall. The XML API is specifically designed for this kind of task. It allows external systems and scripts to interact with the firewall's configuration and operational data.
Here's why the XML API is the appropriate solution and why the other options are not:
D . XML API: The XML API provides a well-defined interface for making changes to the firewall's configuration. This includes creating, modifying, and deleting URL categories and adding or removing URLs within those categories. A script can be written to retrieve the list of 'bad sites' from the company's application and then use the XML API to push those URLs into the custom URL category on the firewall. This process can be automated on a schedule. This is the most efficient and recommended method for this type of integration.
Why other options are incorrect:
A . Dynamic User Groups: Dynamic User Groups are used to dynamically group users based on attributes like username, group membership, or device posture. They are not relevant for managing URL categories.
B . SNMP SET: SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) is primarily used for monitoring and retrieving operational data from network devices. While SNMP can be used to make some configuration changes, it is not well-suited for complex configuration updates like adding multiple URLs to a category. The XML API is the preferred method for configuration changes.
C . Dynamic Address Groups: Dynamic Address Groups are used to dynamically populate address groups based on criteria like tags, IP addresses, or FQDNs. They are intended for managing IP addresses and not URLs, so they are not applicable to this scenario.
Palo Alto Networks Reference:
The primary reference for this is the Palo Alto Networks XML API documentation. Searching the Palo Alto Networks support site (live.paloaltonetworks.com) for 'XML API' will provide access to the latest documentation. This documentation details the various API calls available, including those for managing URL categories.
Specifically, you would look for API calls related to:
Creating or modifying custom URL categories.
Adding or removing URLs from a URL category.
The XML API documentation provides examples and detailed information on how to construct the XML requests and interpret the responses. This is crucial for developing a script to automate the URL updates.
CN-Series firewalls offer threat protection for which three use cases? (Choose three.)
CN-Series firewalls are specifically designed for containerized environments.
Why A, C, and E are correct:
A . Prevention of sensitive data exfiltration from Kubernetes environments: CN-Series provides visibility and control over container traffic, enabling the prevention of data leaving the Kubernetes cluster without authorization.
C . Inbound, outbound, and east-west traffic between containers: CN-Series secures all types of container traffic: ingress (inbound), egress (outbound), and traffic between containers within the cluster (east-west).
E . Enforcement of segmentation policies that prevent lateral movement of threats: CN-Series allows for granular segmentation of containerized applications, limiting the impact of breaches by preventing threats from spreading laterally within the cluster.
Why B and D are incorrect:
B . All Kubernetes workloads in the public and private cloud: While CN-Series can protect Kubernetes workloads in both public and private clouds, the statement 'all Kubernetes workloads' is too broad. Its focus is on securing the network traffic around those workloads, not managing the Kubernetes infrastructure itself.
D . All workloads deployed on-premises or in the public cloud: CN-Series is specifically designed for containerized environments (primarily Kubernetes). It's not intended to protect all workloads deployed in any environment. That's the role of other Palo Alto Networks products like VM-Series, PA-Series, and Prisma Access.
Palo Alto Networks Reference: The Palo Alto Networks documentation on CN-Series firewalls clearly outlines these use cases. Look for information on:
CN-Series Datasheets and Product Pages: These resources describe the key features and benefits of CN-Series, including its focus on container security.
CN-Series Deployment Guides: These guides provide detailed information on deploying and configuring CN-Series in Kubernetes environments.
These resources confirm that CN-Series is focused on securing container traffic within Kubernetes environments, including data exfiltration prevention, securing all traffic directions (inbound, outbound, east-west), and enforcing segmentation
Which statement is valid for both VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs?
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Step-by-Step Explanation:
VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs are both Palo Alto Networks software firewall solutions, but they differ in architecture and deployment models (virtualized vs. cloud-native). The Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall documentation identifies shared characteristics and differences to determine which statements are valid for both solutions.
Panorama can manage VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs (Option B): Panorama is Palo Alto Networks' centralized management platform that supports both VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs. For VM-Series, Panorama provides centralized policy management, logging, and configuration for virtualized deployments in public, private, or hybrid clouds. For Cloud NGFW, Panorama integrates with AWS and Azure to manage policies, configurations, and monitoring, though some management tasks may also leverage cloud-native tools. The documentation consistently highlights Panorama as a unified management solution for both, ensuring consistency across deployments.
Options A (VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs can be deployed in a customer's private cloud), C (Updates for VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs are performed by the customer), and D (VM-Series firewalls and Cloud NGFWs can be deployed in all public cloud vendor environments) are incorrect. While VM-Series firewalls can be deployed in private clouds, Cloud NGFWs are specifically designed for public clouds (AWS and Azure) and are not typically deployed in private clouds, making Option A invalid for both. Updates for Cloud NGFWs are handled automatically by the cloud service (e.g., AWS/Azure), while VM-Series updates are managed by the customer, so Option C is not true for both. VM-Series can be deployed in most public clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP), but Cloud NGFW is limited to AWS and Azure, so Option D is not universally accurate for both solutions.
Which three resources are deployment options for Cloud NGFW for Azure or AWS? (Choose three.)
Cloud NGFW for Azure and AWS can be deployed using various methods.
Why A, B, and E are correct:
A . Azure CLI or Azure Terraform Provider: Cloud NGFW for Azure can be deployed and managed using Azure's command-line interface (CLI) or through Infrastructure-as-Code tools like Terraform. Cloud NGFW for AWS can be deployed and managed using AWS CloudFormation or Terraform.
B . Azure Portal: Cloud NGFW for Azure can be deployed directly through the Azure portal's graphical interface.
E . Palo Alto Networks Ansible playbooks: Palo Alto Networks provides Ansible playbooks for automating the deployment and configuration of Cloud NGFW in both Azure and AWS.
Why C and D are incorrect:
C . AWS Firewall Manager: AWS Firewall Manager is an AWS service for managing AWS WAF, AWS Shield, and VPC security groups. It is not used to deploy Cloud NGFW.
D . Panorama AWS and Azure plugins: While Panorama is used to manage Cloud NGFW, the deployment itself is handled through native cloud tools (Azure portal, CLI, Terraform) or Ansible.
Palo Alto Networks Reference:
Cloud NGFW for Azure and AWS Documentation: This documentation provides deployment instructions using various methods, including the Azure portal, Azure CLI, Terraform, and Ansible.
Palo Alto Networks GitHub Repositories: Palo Alto Networks provides Ansible playbooks and Terraform modules for Cloud NGFW deployments.
Which public cloud provider requires the creation of subnets that are dedicated to Cloud NGFW endpoints?
AWS: Cloud NGFW for AWS leverages AWS Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB) endpoints. These endpoints require dedicated subnets in your VPC for each Availability Zone where you want to deploy the Cloud NGFW. This ensures high availability and proper traffic routing.
Let's look at why the other options are not the primary answer:
Google Cloud Platform (GCP): While GCP has its own networking constructs, Cloud NGFW for GCP doesn't have the same dedicated subnet requirement for endpoints as AWS.
Alibaba Cloud: I don't have specific information about Cloud NGFW deployment models for Alibaba Cloud.
Microsoft Azure: Cloud NGFW for Azure integrates with Azure Virtual WAN and doesn't have the same dedicated subnet requirement for endpoints as AWS.
