At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam questions by Palo Alto Networks. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Palo Alto Networks in their Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Which two software firewall types can protect egress traffic from workloads attached to an Azure vWAN hub? (Choose two.)
Azure vWAN (Virtual WAN) is a networking service that connects on-premises locations, branches, and Azure virtual networks. Protecting egress traffic from workloads attached to a vWAN hub requires a solution that can integrate with the vWAN architecture.
A . Cloud NGFW: Cloud NGFW is designed for cloud environments and integrates directly with Azure networking services, including vWAN. It can be deployed as a secured virtual hub or as a spoke VNet insertion to protect egress traffic.
B . PA-Series: PA-Series are hardware appliances and are not directly deployable within Azure vWAN. They would require complex configurations involving on-premises connectivity and backhauling traffic, which is not a typical or recommended vWAN design.
C . CN-Series: CN-Series is designed for containerized environments and is not suitable for protecting general egress traffic from workloads connected to a vWAN hub.
D . VM-Series: VM-Series firewalls can be deployed in Azure virtual networks that are connected to the vWAN hub. They can then be configured to inspect and control egress traffic. This is a common deployment model for VM-Series in Azure.
A customer is concerned about the administrative effort required to deploy over 200 VM- and CN-Series firewalls across multiple public and private clouds. The customer wants to integrate the deployment of these firewalls into the application-development process to ensure security at the speed of DevOps.
Which deployment option meets the requirements?
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Step-by-Step Explanation:
Deploying and managing a large number of VM-Series and CN-Series firewalls across public (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP) and private clouds requires automation to reduce administrative effort and integrate with DevOps processes. The Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall documentation outlines strategies for scaling and automating firewall deployments to align with modern application development workflows.
Integration with automation and orchestration platforms (Option B): This option involves using tools like Ansible, Terraform, Kubernetes (for CN-Series), and other orchestration platforms to automate the deployment, configuration, and management of VM-Series and CN-Series firewalls. These platforms integrate with DevOps pipelines, enabling Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) practices to deploy firewalls alongside applications, ensuring security is embedded in the development process. The documentation emphasizes automation platforms as the best approach for scaling deployments across multiple clouds, reducing manual effort, and achieving ''security at the speed of DevOps'' by aligning with CI/CD pipelines. This solution supports both VM-Series (via tools like Terraform and Ansible) and CN-Series (via Kubernetes), meeting the customer's multi-cloud and DevOps requirements.
Options A (Push configurations to all firewalls by using Panorama), C (Preconfigured Software Firewall Deployment Profiles), and D (Execution of Cloud NGFW bootstrapping) are incorrect. Pushing configurations via Panorama (Option A) provides centralized management but does not fully integrate with DevOps processes or automate deployment at scale for hundreds of firewalls across clouds---it's more suited for post-deployment management. Preconfigured Software Firewall Deployment Profiles (Option C) simplify initial setup but do not address ongoing automation or DevOps integration for large-scale deployments. Cloud NGFW bootstrapping (Option D) applies only to Cloud NGFW, not VM-Series or CN-Series, and does not meet the customer's need for a unified, automated solution across all firewall types and clouds.
What are three benefits of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series firewalls as they relate to direct integration with third-party network virtualization solution providers? (Choose three.)
The question focuses on the benefits of VM-Series firewalls concerning direct integration with third-party network virtualization solutions.
A . Integration with Cisco ACI allows insertion of a virtual firewall and enforcement of dynamic policies between endpoint groups without the need for manual policy adjustments. This is a key benefit. The integration between Palo Alto Networks VM-Series and Cisco ACI automates the insertion of the firewall into the traffic path and enables dynamic policy enforcement based on ACI endpoint groups (EPGs). This eliminates manual policy adjustments and simplifies operations.
C . Integration with Nutanix AHV allows the firewall to be dynamically informed of changes in the environment and ensures policy is applied to virtual machines (VMs) as they join the network. This is also a core advantage. The integration with Nutanix AHV allows the VM-Series firewall to be aware of VM lifecycle events (creation, deletion, migration). This dynamic awareness ensures that security policies are automatically applied to VMs as they are provisioned or moved within the Nutanix environment.
D . Integration with VMware NSX provides comprehensive visibility and security of all virtualized data center traffic including intra-host ESXi virtual machine (VM) communications. This is a significant benefit. The integration between VM-Series and VMware NSX provides granular visibility and security for all virtualized traffic, including east-west (VM-to-VM) traffic within the same ESXi host. This level of microsegmentation is crucial for securing modern data centers.
Why other options are incorrect:
B . Integration with a third-party network virtualization solution allows management and deployment of the entire virtual network and hosts directly from Panorama. While Panorama provides centralized management for VM-Series firewalls, it does not manage the underlying virtual network infrastructure or hosts of third-party providers like VMware NSX or Cisco ACI. These platforms have their own management planes. Panorama manages the security policies and firewalls, not the entire virtualized infrastructure.
E . Integration with network virtualization solution providers allows manual deployment and management of firewall rules through multiple interfaces and front ends specific to each technology. This is the opposite of what integration aims to achieve. The purpose of integration is to automate and simplify management, not to require manual configuration through multiple interfaces. Direct integration aims to reduce manual intervention and streamline operations.
Palo Alto Networks Reference:
To verify these points, you can refer to the following types of documentation on the Palo Alto Networks support site (live.paloaltonetworks.com):
VM-Series Deployment Guides: These guides often have sections dedicated to integrations with specific virtualization platforms like VMware NSX, Cisco ACI, and Nutanix AHV.
Solution Briefs and White Papers: Palo Alto Networks publishes documents outlining the benefits and technical details of these integrations.
Technology Partner Pages: On the Palo Alto Networks website, there are often pages dedicated to technology partners like VMware, Cisco, and Nutanix, which describe the joint solutions and integrations.
Why are VM-Series firewalls now grouped by four tiers?
The VM-Series tiering simplifies the product portfolio.
Why B is correct: The four-tier model (VE, VE-Lite, VE-Standard, VE-High) simplifies the selection process for customers by grouping VM-Series models based on performance and resource allocation. This makes it easier to choose the appropriate VM-Series instance based on their needs without having to navigate a long list of individual models.
Why A, C, and D are incorrect:
A . To obscure the supported hypervisor manufacturer into generic terms: The tiering is not related to obscuring hypervisor information. The documentation clearly states supported hypervisors.
C . To define the maximum limits for key criteria based on allocated memory: While memory is a factor in performance, the tiers are based on a broader set of resource allocations (vCPUs, memory, throughput) and features, not just memory.
D . To define the priority level of support customers expect when opening a TAC case: Support priority is based on support contracts, not the VM-Series tier.
Palo Alto Networks Reference: VM-Series datasheets and the VM-Series deployment guides explain the tiering model and its purpose of simplifying the portfolio.
A company has purchased Palo Alto Networks Software NGFW credits and wants to run PAN-OS 11.x virtual machines (VMs).
Which two types of VMs can be selected when creating the deployment profile? (Choose two.)
When using Software NGFW credits and deploying PAN-OS VMs, specific deployment models apply.
Why B and D are correct:
B . Fixed vCPU models: These are pre-defined VM sizes with a fixed number of vCPUs and memory. Examples include VM-50, VM-100, VM-200, etc. When using fixed vCPU models, you consume a fixed number of credits per hour based on the chosen model.
D . Flexible vCPUs: This option allows you to dynamically allocate vCPUs and memory within a defined range. Credit consumption is calculated based on the actual resources used. This provides more granular control over resource allocation and cost.
Why A and C are incorrect:
A . VM-100: While VM-100 is a valid fixed vCPU model, it's not a type of VM selection. It's a specific instance within the 'Fixed vCPU models' type. Choosing 'VM-100' is choosing a specific fixed vCPU model.
C . Flexible model of working memory: While you do configure the memory alongside vCPUs in the flexible model, the type of selection is 'Flexible vCPUs.' The flexible model encompasses both vCPU and memory flexibility.
Palo Alto Networks Reference:
The Palo Alto Networks documentation on VM-Series firewalls in public clouds and the associated licensing models (including the use of credits) explicitly describe the 'Fixed vCPU models' and 'Flexible vCPUs' as the two primary deployment options when using credits. The documentation details how credit consumption is calculated for each model.
Specifically, look for information on:
VM-Series Deployment Guide for your cloud provider (AWS, Azure, GCP): These guides detail the different deployment options and how to use credits.
VM-Series Licensing and Credits Documentation: This documentation provides details on how credits are consumed with fixed and flexible models.
For example, the VM-Series Deployment Guide for AWS states:
Fixed vCPU models: These are pre-defined VM sizes... You select a specific VM model (e.g., VM-50, VM-100, VM-300), and you are billed a fixed number of credits per hour.
Flexible vCPUs: This option allows you to specify the number of vCPUs and amount of memory... You are billed based on the actual resources you use.
