At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam questions by Palo Alto Networks. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Palo Alto Networks in their Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Which two methods are valid ways to populate user-to-IP mappings? (Choose two.)
Populating user-to-IP mappings is a critical function for enabling user-based policy enforcement in Palo Alto Networks firewalls. The following two methods are valid ways to populate these mappings:
Why 'XML API' (Correct Answer A)?
The XML API allows external systems to programmatically send user-to-IP mapping information to the firewall. This is a highly flexible method, particularly when user information is available from an external system that integrates via the API. This method is commonly used in environments where the mapping data is maintained in a centralized database or monitoring system.
Why 'User-ID' (Correct Answer C)?
User-ID is a core feature of Palo Alto Networks firewalls that allows for the dynamic identification of users and their corresponding IP addresses. User-ID agents can pull this data from various sources, such as Active Directory, Syslog servers, and more. This is one of the most common and reliable methods to maintain user-to-IP mappings.
Why not 'Captive portal' (Option B)?
Captive portal is a mechanism for authenticating users when they access the network. While it can indirectly contribute to user-to-IP mapping, it is not a direct method to populate these mappings. Instead, it prompts users to authenticate, after which User-ID handles the mapping.
Why not 'SCP log ingestion' (Option D)?
SCP (Secure Copy Protocol) is a file transfer protocol and does not have any functionality related to populating user-to-IP mappings. Log ingestion via SCP is not a valid way to map users to IP addresses.
A systems engineer (SE) successfully demonstrates NGFW managed by Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) to a company. In the resulting planning phase of the proof of value (POV), the CISO requests a test that shows how the security policies are either meeting, or are progressing toward meeting, industry standards such as Critical Security Controls (CSC), and how the company can verify that it is effectively utilizing the functionality purchased.
During the POV testing timeline, how should the SE verify that the POV will meet the CISO's request?
Security Lifecycle Review (SLR) (Answer A):
The Security Lifecycle Review (SLR) is a detailed report generated by Palo Alto Networks firewalls that provides visibility into application usage, threats, and policy alignment with industry standards.
During the POV, running an SLR near the end of the timeline allows the customer to see:
How well their current security policies align with Critical Security Controls (CSC) or other industry standards.
Insights into application usage and threats discovered during the POV.
This provides actionable recommendations for optimizing policies and ensuring the purchased functionality is being effectively utilized.
Why Not B:
While creating custom dashboards and reports at the beginning might provide useful insights, the question focuses on verifying progress toward meeting CSC standards. This is specifically addressed by the SLR, which is designed to measure and report on such criteria.
Why Not C:
Pulling information from SCM dashboards like Best Practices and Feature Adoption can help assess firewall functionality but may not provide a comprehensive review of compliance or CSC alignment, as the SLR does.
Why Not D:
While PANhandler golden images can help configure features in alignment with specific subscriptions or compliance goals, they are primarily used to deploy predefined templates, not to assess security policy effectiveness or compliance with CSC standards.
Reference from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
Security Lifecycle Review Overview
Strata Cloud Manager Dashboards
A systems engineer should create a profile that blocks which category to protect a customer from ransomware URLs by using Advanced URL Filtering?
When configuring Advanced URL Filtering on a Palo Alto Networks firewall, the 'Ransomware' category should be explicitly blocked to protect customers from URLs associated with ransomware activities. Ransomware URLs typically host malicious code or scripts designed to encrypt user data and demand a ransom. By blocking the 'Ransomware' category, systems engineers can proactively prevent users from accessing such URLs.
Why 'Ransomware' (Correct Answer A)?
The 'Ransomware' category is specifically curated by Palo Alto Networks to include URLs known to deliver ransomware or support ransomware operations. Blocking this category ensures that any URL categorized as part of this list will be inaccessible to end-users, significantly reducing the risk of ransomware attacks.
Why not 'High Risk' (Option B)?
While the 'High Risk' category includes potentially malicious sites, it is broader and less targeted. It may not always block ransomware-specific URLs. 'High Risk' includes a range of websites that are flagged based on factors like bad reputation or hosting malicious content in general. It is less focused than the 'Ransomware' category.
Why not 'Scanning Activity' (Option C)?
The 'Scanning Activity' category focuses on URLs used in vulnerability scans, automated probing, or reconnaissance by attackers. Although such activity could be a precursor to ransomware attacks, it does not directly block ransomware URLs.
Why not 'Command and Control' (Option D)?
The 'Command and Control' category is designed to block URLs used by malware or compromised systems to communicate with their operators. While some ransomware may utilize command-and-control (C2) servers, blocking C2 URLs alone does not directly target ransomware URLs themselves.
By using the Advanced URL Filtering profile and blocking the 'Ransomware' category, the firewall applies targeted controls to mitigate ransomware-specific threats.
Which three use cases are specific to Policy Optimizer? (Choose three.)
Discovering Applications on the Network (Answer A):
Policy Optimizer analyzes traffic logs to identify applications running on the network that are currently being allowed by port-based or overly permissive policies.
It provides visibility into these applications, enabling administrators to transition to more secure, application-based policies over time.
Converting Broad Rules into Narrow Rules (Answer B):
Policy Optimizer helps refine policies by converting broad application filters (e.g., rules that allow all web applications) into narrower rules based on specific application groups.
This reduces the risk of overly permissive access while maintaining granular control.
Migrating from Port-Based Rules to Application-Based Rules (Answer C):
One of the primary use cases for Policy Optimizer is enabling organizations to migrate from legacy port-based rules to application-based rules, which are more secure and aligned with Zero Trust principles.
Policy Optimizer identifies traffic patterns and automatically recommends the necessary application-based policies.
Why Not D:
5-tuple attributes (source IP, destination IP, source port, destination port, protocol) are used in traditional firewalls. Simplifying these attributes to 4-tuple (e.g., removing the protocol) is not a use case for Policy Optimizer, as Palo Alto Networks NGFWs focus on application-based policies, not just 5-tuple matching.
Why Not E:
Automating tagging of rules based on historical log data is not a specific feature of Policy Optimizer. While Policy Optimizer analyzes log data to recommend policy changes, tagging is not its primary use case.
Reference from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
Policy Optimizer Overview
Transitioning to Application-Based Policies
A company plans to deploy identity for improved visibility and identity-based controls for least privilege access to applications and dat
a. The company does not have an on-premises Active Directory (AD) deployment, and devices are connected and managed by using a combination of Entra ID and Jamf.
Which two supported sources for identity are appropriate for this environment? (Choose two.)
In this scenario, the company does not use on-premises Active Directory and manages devices with Entra ID and Jamf, which implies a cloud-native and modern management setup. Below is the evaluation of each option:
Option A: Captive portal
Captive portal is typically used in environments where identity mapping is needed for unmanaged devices or guest users. It provides a mechanism for users to authenticate themselves through a web interface.
However, in this case, the company is managing devices using Entra ID and Jamf, which means identity information can already be centralized through other means. Captive portal is not an ideal solution here.
This option is not appropriate.
Option B: User-ID agents configured for WMI client probing
WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) client probing is a mechanism used to map IP addresses to usernames in a Windows environment. This approach is specific to on-premises Active Directory deployments and requires direct communication with Windows endpoints.
Since the company does not have an on-premises AD and is using Entra ID and Jamf, this method is not applicable.
This option is not appropriate.
Option C: GlobalProtect with an internal gateway deployment
GlobalProtect is Palo Alto Networks' VPN solution, which allows for secure remote access. It also supports identity-based mapping when deployed with internal gateways.
In this case, GlobalProtect with an internal gateway can serve as a mechanism to provide user and device visibility based on the managed devices connecting through the gateway.
This option is appropriate.
Option D: Cloud Identity Engine synchronized with Entra ID
The Cloud Identity Engine provides a cloud-based approach to synchronize identity information from identity providers like Entra ID (formerly Azure AD).
In a cloud-native environment with Entra ID and Jamf, the Cloud Identity Engine is a natural fit as it integrates seamlessly to provide identity visibility for applications and data.
This option is appropriate.
Palo Alto Networks documentation on Cloud Identity Engine
GlobalProtect configuration and use cases in Palo Alto Knowledge Base
