Free Oracle 1Z0-1124-25 Exam Actual Questions

The questions for 1Z0-1124-25 were last updated On Apr 7, 2025

At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Oracle 1Z0-1124-25 exam questions by Oracle. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 2025 Networking Professional exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.

Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Oracle in their Oracle 1Z0-1124-25 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 2025 Networking Professional exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Oracle 1Z0-1124-25 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.

 

Question No. 1

You are troubleshooting a BGP peering issue between your on-premises router and an OCI FastConnect virtual circuit. You have verified the physical connectivity and confirmed that the BGP session is established. However, routes are not being exchanged. You suspect a problem with the BGP configuration. What is the MOST LIKELY cause of this issue, assuming the basic BGP configuration (AS numbers, peer IP addresses) is correct?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: C

Problem Context: BGP session is established, but no routes are exchanged, and basic config (ASNs, IPs) is correct.

Option A Analysis: Misconfigured keepalive timers would cause the session to drop intermittently. Since the session is confirmed as established, this is unlikely. Keepalives affect session stability, not route exchange.

Option B Analysis: A mismatch in BGP authentication keys (e.g., MD5 passwords) would prevent the session from establishing. Given the session is up, this is not the issue.

Option C Analysis: BGP prefix lists or route maps filter advertised routes. If either the on-premises router or OCI applies a filter (intentionally or misconfigured), it could block route advertisements despite an established session. This is a common issue in BGP setups and aligns with the symptoms.

Option D Analysis: MTU mismatches could cause packet loss or fragmentation, but BGP uses TCP (small packets), and session establishment indicates MTU isn't the primary issue. Route exchange failures are more likely due to filtering than MTU.

Conclusion: Option C is the most likely cause, as filtering directly prevents route exchange without affecting session status.

From Oracle's FastConnect documentation:

'Once a BGP session is established, routes are exchanged based on the prefixes advertised by each side. Route maps, prefix lists, or filters on either the CPE or OCI side can restrict which routes are advertised or accepted.'

'If no routes appear in the routing table despite an active session, verify that no filters are blocking advertisements.'

This supports Option C as the most likely cause. Reference: FastConnect Overview - Oracle Help Center (docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/fastconnect.htm).


Question No. 2

When setting up cross-tenancy VCN peering using Local Peering Gateways (LPGs), which IAM permission is required in the target tenancy to accept the peering request?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: A

Requirement: IAM permission to accept cross-tenancy LPG peering.

Option A: ''Manage'' allows creating and accepting peering---correct.

Option B: ''Use'' permits using existing LPGs, not accepting requests---incorrect.

Option C: ''Inspect'' is read-only, insufficient---incorrect.

Option D: ''Read'' on virtual-network-family doesn't cover LPG management---incorrect.

Conclusion: Option A is required.

Oracle states:

'To accept a cross-tenancy peering request, the target tenancy needs 'manage local-peering-gateways' permission.'

This confirms Option A. Reference: Local VCN Peering - Oracle Help Center (docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/localVCNpeering.htm).


Question No. 3

You are responsible for maintaining the network connectivity between OCI and Azure using the OCI-Azure Interconnect. You need to perform planned maintenance on your on-premises network, which will temporarily disrupt the BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) sessions between your on-premises network and both OCI and Azure. You want to ensure that traffic between OCI and Azure continues to flow without interruption during the maintenance window. Which action is MOST important to take before starting the maintenance to ensure continuous connectivity between OCI and Azure?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: A

Goal: Ensure OCI-Azure traffic during BGP disruption.

Option A: Static routes bypass BGP dependency, maintaining connectivity---correct.

Option B: Disabling BGP stops routing---incorrect.

Option C: Notification doesn't ensure connectivity---incorrect.

Option D: Keepalive timers delay detection, not prevent disruption---incorrect.

Conclusion: Option A is most critical.

Oracle notes:

'For uninterrupted OCI-Azure Interconnect traffic during BGP maintenance, configure static routes between VCNs and VNets.'

This supports Option A. Reference: OCI-Azure Interconnect - Oracle Help Center (docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Network/Tasks/ociazureinterconnect.htm).


Question No. 4

Your organization is migrating a legacy application to OCI. This application relies on a specific IP address for its external communication, and you need to maintain this IP address during the migration. Which OCI Load Balancer feature or configuration can help you achieve this while ensuring high availability for the application?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: C

Requirement Breakdown: Maintain a specific public IP for external communication with high availability (HA).

Option A: Private IP with NAT Gateway is for outbound traffic from private subnets, not inbound public access. It doesn't support a fixed public IP for external clients.

Option B: Network Load Balancer (NLB) preserves client IPs (source IP) but doesn't allow reserving a specific public IP. IPs are assigned dynamically, failing the requirement.

Option C: Flexible Load Balancer (Application Load Balancer) supports reserving a public IP, ensuring the legacy IP is maintained. It also provides HA across Availability Domains (ADs).

Option D: Multiple load balancers with DNS round-robin don't maintain a single IP---clients see different IPs, violating the requirement.

Conclusion: Option C meets both the specific IP and HA needs efficiently.

Per Oracle documentation:

'The Application Load Balancer (Flexible Load Balancer) allows you to reserve a public IP address, which can be associated with the load balancer for consistent external access.'

'It provides high availability by distributing traffic across multiple backend instances.'

This supports Option C. Reference: Load Balancer Overview - Oracle Help Center (docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Balance/Concepts/balanceoverview.htm).


Question No. 5

A company has deployed a VCN in OCI with multiple subnets. Security requirements dictate that instances in different subnets within the same VCN should not be able to directly communicate with each other unless explicitly permitted. You are tasked with implementing this policy. What is the most appropriate approach to meet this requirement?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: C

Requirement: Restrict inter-subnet communication unless permitted.

Options Analysis:

A: Removing default route breaks all routing, overly restrictive; incorrect.

B: Separate VCNs are excessive, complex; less practical.

C: NSGs provide granular, explicit control; optimal approach.

D: External firewall adds complexity, not VCN-native; inefficient.

NSG Advantage: Instance-level rules enforce policy within VCN.

Conclusion: NSGs are the most appropriate solution.

NSGs enable precise security within a VCN. The Oracle Networking Professional study guide states, 'Network Security Groups (NSGs) allow you to define strict ingress and egress rules for instances, ensuring inter-subnet communication is explicitly permitted as per security policies' (OCI Networking Documentation, Section: Network Security Groups). This is more efficient than VCN separation or external firewalls.