At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Nutanix NCA-6.5 exam questions by Nutanix. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Nutanix Certified Associate (NCA) v6.5 exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Nutanix in their Nutanix NCA-6.5 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Nutanix Certified Associate (NCA) v6.5 exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Nutanix NCA-6.5 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
How can an administrator determine if the cluster can sustain a hardware failure?
Which option allows administrators to specify groups of VMs and assign them to a destination for Disaster Recovery using Leap?
Administrators can use recovery plans to specify groups of virtual machines and assign them to a destination for disaster recovery using Leap. Reference: Nutanix Certified Associate 6.5 Exam Study Guide, page 56
A company's security team has requested that all IT resources be hardened.
What should an administrator do to increase the security of the Nutanix environment?
To increase the security of a Nutanix environment in response to a request from a company's security team, an administrator canEnable STIG (Security Technical Implementation Guide)
Refer to the exhibit.
After an abrupt power outage, an administrator receives a number of alerts indicating disks are failed. Prism Element shows a large number of disks offline as seen in the diagram. This single block, four node cluster is configured FT1 with an RF2 container holding all user data.
What number of drive failures on different domains (node, block, or rack) could this configuration have tolerated prior to seeing data unavailability?
