The test execution schedule should follow the priority order of the tests, as well as the dependency constraints. The priority order is given by the user value column, where higher values indicate higher priority. The dependency constraints are given by the dependency column, where a test ID indicates that the test cannot be run until the test with that ID has been successfully completed. Therefore, the test execution schedule should start with the highest priority test that has no dependency, which is test 5. Then, it should continue with the next highest priority test that has no dependency or has a satisfied dependency, which is test 1. Then, it should proceed with test 2, which depends on test 1, and then test 3, which depends on test 2. Finally, it should end with test 4, which depends on test 3. Thus, the test execution schedule that best meets the prioritisation and dependency conditions is 5,1,2,3,4.

According to the syllabus, the absence-of-errors fallacy is a common misconception that finding and fixing defects will ensure the success of a system. This fallacy ignores the fact that there may be other factors that affect user satisfaction and system value, such as usability, functionality, performance, reliability, security, etc. The answer D is correct because it is an example of the absence-of-errors fallacy. Since testing found very few defects, the system certainly will be successful. This statement assumes that defect detection is the only criterion for system success, which is not true. The other answers are incorrect because they are not examples of the absence-of-errors fallacy, but rather facts or challenges related to testing.

A peer review is a review done by colleagues at the same organizational level, such as developers, testers, or managers. An informal review without moderator is called a walkthrough. A review done by developers and testers together is called an inspection. A review done by developers only is not a specific type of review.

A key difference between black box and white box test design techniques is that white box techniques can measure the extent of code coverage, while black box techniques cannot. Code coverage is a measure of how much of the code of a system or component has been executed by a test or a set of tests. White box techniques use software code to derive test cases that cover specific aspects of the code, such as statements, branches, paths, or data flows. White box techniques can use tools or methods to measure the code coverage achieved by the test cases and identify any gaps or redundancies. Black box techniques use functional design specifications to derive test cases that cover specific aspects of the functionality, behavior, or quality of the system or component, such as inputs, outputs, equivalence classes, boundary values, states, transitions, etc. Black box techniques do not use or access the code of the system or component, and therefore cannot measure the code coverage.

The software not being able to meet the desired response time is an example of a failure. A failure is an event in which a component or system does not perform a required function within specified limits. A failure is observable by end users or testers as a deviation from expected results. defines a failure as follows:

Failure: Deviation of the component or system from its expected delivery, service or result.

B, C, and D are incorrect answers. The software not being able to meet the desired response time is not an example of a defect (B), an error , or not a defect (D). A defect is a flaw in a component or system that can cause it to fail to perform its required function. An error is a human action that produces an incorrect result. Not a defect is a term used to describe an incident report that is rejected or closed as invalid or out of scope. defines these terms as follows:

Defect: A flaw in a component or system that can cause the component or system to fail to perform its required function.

Error: A human action that produces an incorrect result.

Not a defect: An incident report status indicating that there is no defect in relation to this incident report.