At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the IIBA CBAP exam questions by IIBA. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by IIBA in their IIBA CBAP exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the IIBA CBAP exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
A business unit of a transnational manufacturer wants to implement a robust process for addressing integrity- critical equipment deterioration incidents. Timely and complete resolution of such incidents is vital for the business unit's continuous safe and profitable operation. Treating each incident involves many employees from different departments extensively collaborating and exchanging information. That information is spread across multiple systems having their access limited to particular user groups. With the current manual process, some incidents get forgotten and remain unresolved for years.
The project's Sponsor is an Equipment Integrity and Reliability Advisor, who moved into this position from another business unit. That business unit implemented a proprietary application to integrate the information and to assist in tracking and managing the incidents. Having a positive experience with the application, the Sponsor is suggesting to customize it and reuse in the new business unit.
The business unit's Enterprise Architect (EA), who is responsible for assessing solution options and presenting them to executive decision makers, has a few concerns with adopting the existing application. The application uses point-to-point interfaces with other data sources whereas the business unit's target architecture relies on a data warehouse-based integration. Moreover, the two business units use different legacy systems, as well as different front-end implementation technologies. Additionally, the existing application is monolingual, while the business unit needs user interfaces and some data to be presented in two languages. With all of this, it may be easier to build a new application from scratch than to customize the existing one. To understand which option is better, the EA asks a business analyst (BA) to define business requirements.
The EA wants to understand whether the integration capabilities of the existing solution match the business unit's IT landscape. The requirement definition that the EA needs should read as, "Each record of an incident shall ."
The EA is interested in how the existing solution integrates with other data sources, such as the asset management system. Therefore, the requirement should specify how the incident records are linked to the equipment records in the asset management system. Option D does that by stating that the incident records use the Equipment ID as a foreign key to relate to the equipment records. Option A is too vague and does not indicate how the association is established. Option B implies that the incident records duplicate the equipment information, which is not desirable for data integrity and consistency. Option C does not specify where the Equipment ID comes from or how it is used to link the incident records to the equipment records.Reference:
I . A health insurance provider undertakes enhancements to its mobile application platform and finalizes the following capabilities as part of the scope of the next release:
L Ability to integrate online maps and global positioning system (GPS) technology with the mobile application in real time to display location of service providers in the subscriber's that participate in the subscriber's plan network.
Ability for the subscriber to lookup the service providers by specifying either a postal code on a search area radius in miles.
III . Ability for the subscriber to initial the download of fee information for one more service providers in a single request.
Through requirements workshops the business analyst elicits the following detailed business requirements:
1. The company's mobile application platform must support real time integration with the following third-party systems:
A . GPS System
B . Postal Code Validation
2. The service providers available for selection must participate in the subscriber's medical plan network as of the current system date.
3. The map display shall highlight the boundary of the search area with a dotted yellow line.
4. The extent and shape of he searches area shall be determined based on one of the following user choices:
A postal code-Subscriber location acquired from GPS shall be used to determine and populate........................
Which of the following is the appropriate technique to define communication flows between the Postal Code validation system with other systems?
Interface analysis is a technique that helps the business analyst identify and specify the interactions and information exchanges between different systems, components, or actors. Interface analysis can help define the communication flows between the Postal Code validation system and other systems, such as the GPS system, the mobile application platform, and the service provider database. Interface analysis can also help specify the interface requirements, such as the format, frequency, and protocol of the data exchange, and the interface design, such as the layout, navigation, and functionality of the user interface.Reference:
IIBA BABOK Guide, Section 10.20, Interface Analysis
Interface Analysis, Business Analyst Learnings
Interface Analysis: A Key Technique for Business Analysts, BA Times
The stakeholder of a new product that is in early adaptive development has requested a change to an approved feature. How should the business analyst (BA) handle this change?
The BA should handle the change request by adding the feature to the product backlog for future prioritization. The product backlog is a list of features, functions, and requirements that are desired for the solution, but have not yet been planned or implemented. The product backlog is constantly updated and prioritized by the product owner, who represents the voice of the customer and the stakeholders. The BA should collaborate with the product owner to capture and document the change request and add it to the product backlog. The product owner will then decide when and how to prioritize the feature for the next iteration or release, based on the value and urgency of the feature and the feedback from the stakeholders.Reference:
A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK Guide), Version 3, Chapter 3: Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, Section 3.2: Plan Business Analysis Approach, p. 58-59
A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK Guide), Version 3, Chapter 4: Elicitation and Collaboration, Section 4.6: Communicate Business Analysis Information, p. 124-125
A very large insurer of General Liability and Property Damage insurance has an upward trend of increased claims over the past 5 years.
The Risk Control Area for that company has just completed a 12 month Pilot of a new improved Risk Control Site.
The purpose of the site is to help their customers manage their exposures and ideally prevent them from having claims There were 100 customers that were part of the Pilot that represented 25 different industries. The business goals were to increase use of the site and provide tools to help customer awareness of their exposures, so that they may reduce existing exposures and ultimately reduce claims.
The sites Features were as follows:
* Improvements to the search engine to all customers to search for articles, tools and services on the site
* A checklist function that allow customer to create their own unique Checklists or utilize a sample provided by ABC company to use daily, weekly etc for an area of their facility.
* A promotion feature - where Risk preventing Articles, and tools on the site are marketed toward a customer.
* A profile section allowing for Customer Name, Address and contact Phone number.
Alter the 12 month pilot the business sponsor received an assessment of what was working and what was not. The Assessment of the pilot revealed overall site activity had significantly increased, however only 5% of the time the promotions were viewed. And the most shocking was that total claims increased by nearly 20% for these 100 customers during the pilot period. The business sponsor was perplexed as he had an expectation of reduced claims and at least for 30% viewing of promotions since the project team had spent a lot of careful time and effort on this feature. A BA was assigned to do further analysis regarding the low use of the promotions and why claims were not being reduced.
Regarding the use of promotions the BA looked into other similar companies to see what they did differently to get their customer to look at their promotions. The BA found that similar companies had promotions that targeted the industry the customer was in so it was more relevant to them and they were more interested to view the promotion. In addition the BA sent out a survey to all 100 pilot customers asking probing questions about what they thought of the site and if they felt it had decreased their exposure to risk sufficiently. The Survey responses came back with raving positive comments and providing examples of how the site had been helping in the reduction of claims from the customer's perspective. In addition the survey also revealed insight that the customers found the promotion often irrelevant to their industry.
The BA asked for a dump of all documentation of the 1000 claims that were filed over the 12 month pilot period. The BA found the nearly 90% of the claim filed were all in one region of the country and were all for property damage related to several severe winter storms in the region and the claims were nearly all unavoidable by the customers. The BA brought all this analysis back to the business sponsor and made the recommendation to the business sponsor to require the customer to select 1 of 25 industries in their profile. This would in turn allow for the ability to show industry specific promotions and promote search results relative to a customer's industry to be sorted at the top giving the customer a more personalized experience.
What was the business sponsor looking to validate about the use of promotions?
Performance variance is the difference between the actual and expected results of a business activity or process. In this case, the business sponsor expected that the promotions would be viewed by at least 30% of the customers and that they would help reduce claims. However, the actual results showed that only 5% of the customers viewed the promotions and that claims increased by 20%. The business sponsor wanted to understand the reasons for this discrepancy and how to improve the effectiveness of the promotions.
What business analysis element tries to identify as many potential options as possible to meet the business objectives and fill identified gaps in capabilities?
Alternative generation is a business analysis element that tries to identify as many potential options as possible to meet the business objectives and fill identified gaps in capabilities. Alternative generation is part of the strategy analysis knowledge area, which involves defining the business need, assessing the current state, defining the future state, identifying solution options, and recommending a solution. Alternative generation helps to explore the possible ways to achieve the desired outcomes, and to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and suitability of each option. Alternative generation can use various techniques, such as brainstorming, benchmarking, market analysis, or SWOT analysis, to generate and compare different solution alternatives.Reference:
What Is Business Analysis and Why Is It Important? - Indeed, paragraph 4
More CBAP Preparation Questions -- The Functional BA, question 4