Which of the following is NOT a type of privacy program metric?
Data enhancement metrics are not a type of privacy program metric because they do not measure the performance, value, or risk of the privacy program. Data enhancement metrics are related to the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the data collected and processed by the organization, which are not directly linked to the privacy program objectives.Reference:CIPM Body of Knowledge, Domain II: Privacy Program Governance, Section B: Establishing a Privacy Program Framework, Subsection 2: Privacy Program Metrics.
Which of the following is NOT a type of privacy program metric?
Types of privacy program metrics include business enablement metrics, data enhancement metrics, and commercial metrics. Business enablement metrics measure the effectiveness of the privacy program in enabling the business to function without compromising privacy. Data enhancement metrics measure the effectiveness of the privacy program in enhancing data protection, such as through data minimization, access controls, and data security. Commercial metrics measure the effectiveness of the privacy program in creating value, such as through the development of new products, services, and customer experiences.
Privacy program metrics are used to assess the effectiveness of a privacy program and measure its progress. These metrics can include business enablement metrics, data enhancement metrics, and commercial metrics. Value creation metrics, however, are not typically used as privacy program metrics.
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
Ben works in the IT department of IgNight, Inc., a company that designs lighting solutions for its clients. Although IgNight's customer base consists primarily of offices in the US, some individuals have been so impressed by the unique aesthetic and energy-saving design of the light fixtures that they have requested
IgNight's installations in their homes across the globe.
One Sunday morning, while using his work laptop to purchase tickets for an upcoming music festival, Ben happens to notice some unusual user activity on company files. From a cursory review, all the data still appears to be where it is meant to be but he can't shake off the feeling that something is not right. He knows that it is a possibility that this could be a colleague performing unscheduled maintenance, but he recalls an email from his company's security team reminding employees to be on alert for attacks from a known group of malicious actors specifically targeting the industry.
Ben is a diligent employee and wants to make sure that he protects the company but he does not want to bother his hard-working colleagues on the weekend. He is going to discuss the matter with this manager first thing in the morning but wants to be prepared so he can demonstrate his knowledge in this area and plead his case for a promotion.
To determine the steps to follow, what would be the most appropriate internal guide for Ben to review?
The most appropriate internal guide for Ben to review is the Incident Response Plan. An Incident Response Plan is a document that outlines how an organization will respond to a security incident, such as a data breach, a cyberattack, or a malware infection. An Incident Response Plan typically includes:
The roles and responsibilities of the incident response team and other stakeholders
The procedures and protocols for detecting, containing, analyzing, and resolving incidents
The communication and escalation channels for reporting and notifying incidents
The tools and resources for conducting incident response activities
The criteria and methods for evaluating and improving the incident response process
An Incident Response Plan helps an organization prepare for and deal with security incidents in an effective and efficient manner. It also helps an organization minimize the impact and damage of security incidents, comply with legal and regulatory obligations, and restore normal operations as soon as possible.
An organization's internal audit team should do all of the following EXCEPT?
An organization's internal audit team should not implement processes to correct audit failures, as this is the responsibility of the management or the privacy office. The internal audit team should only verify that technical measures are in place, review how operations work in practice, and ensure policies are being adhered to. Implementing corrective actions would compromise the independence and objectivity of the internal audit team.Reference:CIPM Body of Knowledge, Domain III: Privacy Program Operational Life Cycle, Section A: Assess, Subsection 1: Privacy Assessments and Audits.
You would like your organization to be independently audited to demonstrate compliance with international privacy standards and to identify gaps for remediation.
Which type of audit would help you achieve this objective?
A third-party audit would help an organization achieve the objective of demonstrating compliance with international privacy standards and identifying gaps for remediation. A third-party audit is an audit conducted by an independent and external auditor who is not affiliated with either the audited organization or its customers. A third-party audit can provide an objective and impartial assessment of the organization's privacy practices and policies, as well as verify its compliance with relevant standards and regulations. A third-party audit can also help the organization identify areas for improvement and recommend corrective actions. A third-party audit can enhance the organization's reputation, trustworthiness, and credibility among its stakeholders and customers.
A first-party audit is an audit conducted by the organization itself or by someone within the organization who has been designated as an auditor. A first-party audit is also known as an internal audit. A first-party audit can help the organization monitor its own performance, evaluate its compliance with internal policies and procedures, and identify potential risks and opportunities for improvement. However, a first-party audit may not be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with external standards and regulations, as it may lack independence and objectivity.
