Free IAPP CIPM Exam Actual Questions

The questions for CIPM were last updated On Dec 19, 2024

Question No. 2

A systems audit uncovered a shared drive folder containing sensitive employee data with no access controls and therefore was available for all employees to view. What is the first step to mitigate further risks?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: D

The first step to mitigate further risks when a systems audit uncovers a shared drive folder containing sensitive employee data with no access controls is to restrict access to the folder. This can be done by implementing appropriate access controls, such as user authentication, role-based access, and permissions, to ensure that only authorized individuals can view and access the sensitive data.


https://www.sans.org/cyber-security-summit/archives/file/summit-archive-1492158151.pdf

https://www.itgovernance.co.uk/blog/5-reasons-why-employees-dont-report-data-breaches/

https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/report-cyber-incident

Question No. 3

An organization's privacy officer was just notified by the benefits manager that she accidentally sent out the retirement enrollment report of all employees to a wrong vendor.

Which of the following actions should the privacy officer take first?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: A

The first action that the privacy officer should take after being notified by the benefits manager that she accidentally sent out the retirement enrollment report of all employees to a wrong vendor is to perform a risk of harm analysis.A risk of harm analysis is a process of assessing the potential adverse consequences for the individuals whose personal data has been compromised by a data breach or incident5The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether the breach or incident poses a significant risk of harm to the affected individuals, such as identity theft, fraud, discrimination, physical harm, emotional distress, or reputational damage6The risk of harm analysis should consider various factors, such as the type and amount of data involved, the sensitivity and context of the data, the likelihood and severity of harm, the characteristics of the recipients or unauthorized parties who accessed the data, and the mitigating measures taken or available to reduce the harm7Based on this analysis, the privacy officer can then decide whether to notify the affected individuals, the relevant authorities, or other stakeholders about the breach or incident.Notification is usually required by law or best practice when there is a high risk of harm to the individuals as a result of the breach or incident8Notification can also help to mitigate the harm by allowing the individuals to take protective actions or seek remedies.Therefore, performing a risk of harm analysis is a crucial first step for responding to a data breach or incident.Reference:5:Can a risk of harm itself be a harm? | Analysis | Oxford Academic;6:No Harm Done? Assessing Risk of Harm under the Federal Breach Notification Rule;7:CCOHS: Hazard and Risk - Risk Assessment;8: Breach Notification Requirements in Canada | PrivacySense.net


Question No. 4

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

Your organization, the Chicago (U.S.)-based Society for Urban Greenspace, has used the same vendor to

operate all aspects of an online store for several years. As a small nonprofit, the Society cannot afford the higher-priced options, but you have been relatively satisfied with this budget vendor, Shopping Cart Saver (SCS). Yes, there have been some issues. Twice, people who purchased items from the store have had their credit card information used fraudulently subsequent to transactions on your site, but in neither case did the investigation reveal with certainty that the Society's store had been hacked. The thefts could have been employee-related.

Just as disconcerting was an incident where the organization discovered that SCS had sold information it had collected from customers to third parties. However, as Jason Roland, your SCS account representative, points out, it took only a phone call from you to clarify expectations and the ''misunderstanding'' has not occurred again.

As an information-technology program manager with the Society, the role of the privacy professional is only one of many you play. In all matters, however, you must consider the financial bottom line. While these problems with privacy protection have been significant, the additional revenues of sales of items such as shirts and coffee cups from the store have been significant. The Society's operating budget is slim, and all sources of revenue are essential.

Now a new challenge has arisen. Jason called to say that starting in two weeks, the customer data from the store would now be stored on a data cloud. ''The good news,'' he says, ''is that we have found a low-cost provider in Finland, where the data would also be held. So, while there may be a small charge to pass through to you, it won't be exorbitant, especially considering the advantages of a cloud.''

Lately, you have been hearing about cloud computing and you know it's fast becoming the new paradigm for various applications. However, you have heard mixed reviews about the potential impacts on privacy protection. You begin to research and discover that a number of the leading cloud service providers have signed a letter of intent to work together on shared conventions and technologies for privacy protection. You make a note to find out if Jason's Finnish provider is signing on.

What process can best answer your Questions about the vendor's data security safeguards?

Show Answer Hide Answer
Correct Answer: A

This answer is the best process to answer Albert's questions about the vendor's data security safeguards, as it can provide a direct and comprehensive way to assess and verify the vendor's compliance with the applicable laws, regulations, standards and best practices for data protection. A second-party or supplier audit is conducted by the organization that hires or contracts the vendor to evaluate their performance and alignment with the organization's standards and expectations. A second-party or supplier audit can also help to identify any gaps, weaknesses or risks in the vendor's data security safeguards, and to recommend or require any improvements or corrective actions.


Question No. 5

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

John is the new privacy officer at the prestigious international law firm -- A&M LLP. A&M LLP is very proud of its reputation in the practice areas of Trusts & Estates and Merger & Acquisition in both U.S. and Europe.

During lunch with a colleague from the Information Technology department, John heard that the Head of IT, Derrick, is about to outsource the firm's email continuity service to their existing email security vendor -- MessageSafe. Being successful as an email hygiene vendor, MessageSafe is expanding its business by leasing cloud infrastructure from Cloud Inc. to host email continuity service for A&M LLP.

John is very concerned about this initiative. He recalled that MessageSafe was in the news six months ago due to a security breach. Immediately, John did a quick research of MessageSafe's previous breach and learned that the breach was caused by an unintentional mistake by an IT administrator. He scheduled a meeting with Derrick to address his concerns.

At the meeting, Derrick emphasized that email is the primary method for the firm's lawyers to communicate with clients, thus it is critical to have the email continuity service to avoid any possible email downtime. Derrick has been using the anti-spam service provided by MessageSafe for five years and is very happy with the quality of service provided by MessageSafe. In addition to the significant discount offered by MessageSafe, Derrick emphasized that he can also speed up the onboarding process since the firm already has a service contract in place with MessageSafe. The existing on-premises email continuity solution is about to reach its end of life very soon and he doesn't have the time or resource to look for another solution. Furthermore, the off- premises email continuity service will only be turned on when the email service at A&M LLP's primary and secondary data centers are both down, and the email messages stored at MessageSafe site for continuity service will be automatically deleted after 30 days.

Which of the following is NOT an obligation of MessageSafe as the email continuity service provider for A&M LLP?

Show Answer Hide Answer