According to the Aruba Cloud Authentication and Policy Overview1, Device Insight tags are stored in the Endpoint Repository and can be used as conditions within CPPM role mapping or enforcement policy rules. The rule condition type should be Endpoint, and the attribute should be Device Insight Tags. No extra authorization source is required for services that use policies with these rules. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

Option A is incorrect because creating an HTTP authentication source to the Central API is not necessary to use Device Insight tags as conditions. Device Insight tags are already synchronized between Central and CPPM, and can be accessed from the Endpoint Repository.

Option B is incorrect because using the Application type for the rule conditions is not applicable to Device Insight tags. The Application type is used to match attributes from the Application Authentication source, which is used to integrate with third-party applications such as Microsoft Intune or Google G Suite.

Option C is incorrect because using the Endpoints Repository type for the rule conditions is not valid for Device Insight tags. The Endpoints Repository type is used to match attributes from the Endpoints Repository source, which is different from the Endpoint type. The Endpoints Repository source contains information about endpoints that are manually added or imported into CPPM, while the Endpoint type contains information about endpoints that are dynamically discovered and profiled by CPPM or Device Insight. Adding Endpoints Repository as a secondary authentication source for services that use policies with these rules is also unnecessary and redundant.

Alert duration and threshold settings are used to control how often and under what conditions email notifications are sent for gateway IDS/IPS events1. By adjusting these settings, the customer can reduce the frequency of repeat email notifications for the same threat, while still being informed of any critical or new threats.

To adjust the alert duration and threshold settings in Aruba Central, the customer can follow these steps1:

In the Aruba Central app, set the filter to Global, a group, or a device.

Under Analyze, click Alerts & Events.

Click the Config icon to open the Alert Severities & Notifications page.

Select the Gateway IDS/IPS tab to view the alert categories and severities for gateway IDS/IPS events.

Click on an alert category to expand it and view the alert duration and threshold settings for each severity level.

Enter a value in minutes for the alert duration. This is the time period during which the alert is active and email notifications are sent.

Enter a value for the alert threshold. This is the number of times the alert must be triggered within the alert duration before an email notification is sent.

Click Save.

By increasing the alert duration and/or threshold values, the customer can reduce the number of email notifications for recurring threats, as they will only be sent when the threshold is reached within the duration. For example, if the customer sets the alert duration to 60 minutes and the alert threshold to 10 for a Critical severity level, then an email notification will only be sent if the same threat occurs 10 times or more within an hour.

This is because SNMPv3 is a secure version of SNMP that provides authentication, encryption, and access control for network management. SNMPv3-only is a configuration option on AOS-CX switches that disables SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c, which are insecure versions of SNMP that use plain text community strings for authentication. By setting the snmp-server settings to ''snmpv3-only'', the switch will only respond to SNMPv3 requests and reject any SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c requests, thus remedying the vulnerability and meeting the customer's requirements.

A) Enabling control plane policing to automatically drop SNMP GET requests. This is not a valid recommendation because control plane policing is a feature that protects the switch from denial-of-service (DoS) attacks by limiting the rate of traffic sent to the CPU. Control plane policing does not disable SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c, but rather applies a rate limit to all SNMP requests, regardless of the version. Moreover, control plane policing might also drop legitimate SNMP requests if they exceed the rate limit, which could affect the network management.

C) Adding an SNMP community with a long random name. This is not a valid recommendation because an SNMP community is a shared secret that acts as a password for accessing network devices using SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c. Adding an SNMP community with a long random name does not disable SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c, but rather creates another community string that can be used for authentication. Moreover, adding an SNMP community with a long random name does not improve the security of SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c, as the community string is still transmitted in plain text and can be intercepted by an attacker.

D) Enabling SNMPv3, which implicitly disables SNMPv1/v2. This is not a valid recommendation because enabling SNMPv3 does not implicitly disable SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c on AOS-CX switches. Enabling SNMPv3 only adds support for the secure version of SNMP, but does not remove support for the insecure versions. Therefore, enabling SNMPv3 alone does not remedy the vulnerability or meet the customer's requirements.

Dynamic authorization is a feature that allows CPPM to send change of authorization (CoA) or disconnect messages to the MC to modify or terminate a user session based on certain conditions or events1.Dynamic authorization uses the RFC 3576 protocol, which is an extension of the RADIUS protocol2.

To enable dynamic authorization on the MC, you need to configure the IP address and UDP port of the CPPM server as the RFC 3576 server on the MC3. The default UDP port for RFC 3576 is 3799, but it can be changed on the CPPM server .The MC and CPPM must use the same UDP port for dynamic authorization to work properly3.

In this scenario, the MC is configured with the IP address of the CPPM server (10.47.47.8) as the RFC 3576 server, but it is using the default UDP port of 3799. However, according to the exhibit, the CPPM server is using a different UDP port of 1700 for dynamic authorization . This mismatch causes the CoA requests from CPPM to fail on the MC, as shown by the statistics .

To fix this issue, you need to change the UDP port in the MCs' RFC 3576 server config to match the UDP port used by CPPM, which is 1700 in this case. Alternatively, you can change the UDP port in CPPM to match the default UDP port of 3799 on the MC.Either way, you need to ensure that both devices use the same UDP port for dynamic authorization3.