At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer exam questions by Google. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Google in their Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
You work for a company that captures live video footage of checkout areas in their retail stores You need to use the live video footage to build a mode! to detect the number of customers waiting for service in near real time You want to implement a solution quickly and with minimal effort How should you build the model?
You developed a BigQuery ML linear regressor model by using a training dataset stored in a BigQuery table. New data is added to the table every minute. You are using Cloud Scheduler and Vertex Al Pipelines to automate hourly model training, and use the model for direct inference. The feature preprocessing logic includes quantile bucketization and MinMax scaling on data received in the last hour. You want to minimize storage and computational overhead. What should you do?
The best option to minimize storage and computational overhead is to use the TRANSFORM clause in the CREATE MODEL statement in the SQL query to calculate the required statistics. The TRANSFORM clause allows you to specify feature preprocessing logic that applies to both training and prediction. The preprocessing logic is executed in the same query as the model creation, which avoids the need to create and store intermediate tables. The TRANSFORM clause also supports quantile bucketization and MinMax scaling, which are the preprocessing steps required for this scenario. Option A is incorrect because creating a component in the Vertex AI Pipelines DAG to calculate the required statistics may increase the computational overhead, as the component needs to run separately from the model creation. Moreover, the component needs to pass the statistics to subsequent components, which may increase the storage overhead. Option B is incorrect because preprocessing and staging the data in BigQuery prior to feeding it to the model may also increase the storage and computational overhead, as you need to create and maintain additional tables for the preprocessed data. Moreover, you need to ensure that the preprocessing logic is consistent for both training and inference. Option C is incorrect because creating SQL queries to calculate and store the required statistics in separate BigQuery tables may also increase the storage and computational overhead, as you need to create and maintain additional tables for the statistics. Moreover, you need to ensure that the statistics are updated regularly to reflect the new data.Reference:
Feature preprocessing with BigQuery ML
You are developing an ML model using a dataset with categorical input variables. You have randomly split half of the data into training and test sets. After applying one-hot encoding on the categorical variables in the training set, you discover that one categorical variable is missing from the test set. What should you do?
The best option for dealing with the missing categorical variable in the test set is to apply one-hot encoding on the categorical variables in the test data. This option has the following advantages:
It ensures the consistency and compatibility of the data format for the ML model, as the one-hot encoding transforms the categorical variables into binary vectors that can be easily processed by the model. By applying one-hot encoding on the categorical variables in the test data, you can match the number and order of the features in the test data with the training data, and avoid any errors or discrepancies in the model prediction.
It preserves the information and relevance of the data for the ML model, as the one-hot encoding creates a separate feature for each possible value of the categorical variable, and assigns a value of 1 to the feature corresponding to the actual value of the variable, and 0 to the rest. By applying one-hot encoding on the categorical variables in the test data, you can retain the original meaning and importance of the categorical variable, and avoid any loss or distortion of the data.
The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:
Option A: Randomly redistributing the data, with 70% for the training set and 30% for the test set, introduces additional complexity and risk. This option requires reshuffling and splitting the data again, which can be tedious and time-consuming. Moreover, this option may not guarantee that the missing categorical variable will be present in the test set, as it depends on the randomness of the data distribution. Furthermore, this option may affect the quality and validity of the ML model, as it may change the data characteristics and patterns that the model has learned from the original training set.
Option B: Using sparse representation in the test set introduces additional overhead and inefficiency. This option requires converting the categorical variables in the test set into sparse vectors, which are vectors that have mostly zero values and only store the indices and values of the non-zero elements. However, using sparse representation in the test set may not be compatible with the ML model, as the model expects the input data to have the same format and dimensionality as the training data, which uses one-hot encoding. Moreover, using sparse representation in the test set may not be efficient or scalable, as it requires additional computation and memory to store and process the sparse vectors.
Option D: Collecting more data representing all categories introduces additional cost and delay. This option requires obtaining and labeling more data that contains the missing categorical variable, which can be expensive and time-consuming. Moreover, this option may not be feasible or necessary, as the missing categorical variable may not be available or relevant for the test data, depending on the data source or the business problem.
You are implementing a batch inference ML pipeline in Google Cloud. The model was developed by using TensorFlow and is stored in SavedModel format in Cloud Storage. You need to apply the model to a historical dataset that is stored in a BigQuery table. You want to perform inference with minimal effort. What should you do?
Vertex AI batch prediction is the most appropriate and efficient way to apply a pre-trained model like TensorFlow's SavedModel to a large dataset, especially for batch processing.
The Vertex AI batch prediction job works by exporting your dataset (in this case, historical data from BigQuery) to a suitable format (like Avro or CSV) and then processing it in Cloud Storage where the model is stored.
Avro format is recommended for large datasets as it is highly efficient for data storage and is optimized for read/write operations in Google Cloud, which is why option B is correct.
Option A suggests using BigQuery ML for inference, but it does not support running arbitrary TensorFlow models directly within BigQuery ML. Hence, BigQuery ML is not a valid option for this particular task.
Option C (exporting to CSV) is a valid alternative but is less efficient compared to Avro in terms of performance.
You need to analyze user activity data from your company's mobile applications. Your team will use BigQuery for data analysis, transformation, and experimentation with ML algorithms. You need to ensure real-time ingestion of the user activity data into BigQuery. What should you do?
The best option to ensure real-time ingestion of the user activity data into BigQuery is to run a Dataflow streaming job to ingest the data into BigQuery. Dataflow is a fully managed service that can handle both batch and stream processing of data, and can integrate seamlessly with BigQuery and other Google Cloud services. Dataflow can also use Apache Beam as the programming model, which provides a unified and portable API for developing data pipelines. By using Dataflow, you can avoid the complexity and overhead of managing your own infrastructure, and focus on the logic and transformation of your data. Dataflow can also handle various types of data, such as structured, unstructured, or binary data, and can apply windowing, aggregation, and other operations on the data streams.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
A . Configuring Pub/Sub to stream the data into BigQuery is not a good option, as Pub/Sub is a messaging service that can publish and subscribe to data streams, but cannot perform any transformation or processing on the data. Pub/Sub can be used as a source or a sink for Dataflow, but not as a standalone solution for ingesting data into BigQuery.
B . Running an Apache Spark streaming job on Dataproc to ingest the data into BigQuery is not a good option, as it requires setting up and managing your own cluster of virtual machines, which can increase the cost and complexity of your solution. Moreover, Apache Spark is not natively integrated with BigQuery, and requires using connectors or intermediate storage to write data to BigQuery, which can introduce latency and inefficiency.
D . Configuring Pub/Sub and a Dataflow streaming job to ingest the data into BigQuery is not a bad option, but it is not necessary, as Dataflow can directly read data from the mobile applications without using Pub/Sub as an intermediary. Using Pub/Sub can add an extra layer of abstraction and reliability, but it can also increase the cost and complexity of your solution, and introduce some delay in the data ingestion.
Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide
Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate
Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification
Dataflow documentation
BigQuery documentation
