At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Fortinet NSE6_WCS-7.0 exam questions by Fortinet. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Fortinet NSE 6 - Cloud Security 7.0 for AWS exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Fortinet in their Fortinet NSE6_WCS-7.0 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Fortinet NSE 6 - Cloud Security 7.0 for AWS exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Fortinet NSE6_WCS-7.0 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Your company deployed a FortiSandbox for AWS.
Which statement is correct about FortiSandbox for AWS?
FortiSandbox Deployment:
FortiSandbox for AWS deploys new EC2 instances to create isolated environments where it can safely execute and analyze suspicious files. These instances run custom Windows and Linux virtual machines specifically configured for sandboxing (Option D).
Sandboxing Process:
The process involves sending potential malware to these isolated VMs, executing it, and monitoring its behavior to detect malicious activities. The results are then captured and analyzed to provide detailed threat intelligence.
Other Options Analysis:
Option A is incorrect because FortiSandbox for AWS operates entirely within the AWS environment and does not require an on-premises manager.
Option B is incorrect as the FortiSandbox manager is not installed on the AWS platform for managing on-premises instances.
Option C is incorrect because FortiSandbox requires sufficient resources to perform the actual sandboxing and analysis tasks.
FortiSandbox for AWS Documentation: FortiSandbox
Your customers have been reporting slow response times when accessing your web application.
What are two possible ways to increase response times from web servers protected by FortiWeb Cloud? (Choose two.)
Your customers have been reporting slow response times when accessing your web application.
What are two possible ways to increase response times from web servers protected by FortiWeb Cloud? (Choose two.)
Same Region Deployment:
Deploying FortiWeb Cloud in the same AWS region as your web application minimizes latency and ensures faster response times by reducing the distance data needs to travel (Option A).
Content Delivery Network (CDN):
Enabling a CDN can significantly improve response times by caching content closer to the end-users, reducing the load on the origin server, and speeding up content delivery (Option B).
Other Options Analysis:
Option C is incorrect because modifying DNS entries to directly point to your web server bypasses the WAF protection, which is not advisable for security reasons.
Option D is incorrect because disabling WAF functionality would expose your web application to vulnerabilities and threats, compromising security.
Refer to the exhibit.
A customer is using the AWS Elastic Load Balancer (ELB).
Which two statements are correct about the ELB configuration? (Choose two.)
Load Balancer Configuration Overview:
The provided configuration indicates that the ELB is an internet-facing load balancer.
Multi-AZ Load Balancing:
The load balancer is configured to distribute traffic across multiple availability zones (A, B, and C), ensuring high availability and fault tolerance (Option A).
Accessing Targets via DNS:
The DNS name of the load balancer (LabELB-716e15332f6401f8.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com) can be used to reach the targets behind the ELB, facilitating traffic routing to the appropriate instances (Option C).
Comparison with Other Options:
Option B is incorrect as the ARN is not used to access the load balancer directly.
Option D is incorrect because the load balancer is configured for internet-facing traffic, not just internal VPC traffic.
Refer to the exhibit.
You deployed an active-passive FortiGate HA cluster using a CloudFormation template on an existing VPC. Now you want to test active-passive FortiGate HA failover by running a debug so you can see the API calls to change the Elastic and secondary IP addresses.
Which statement is correct about the output of the debug?
HA Event and Failover:
The debug output indicates that a failover event occurred and the secondary instance (Fgt2) is now taking over as the master.
Elastic IP Association:
The debug output shows the process of moving the Elastic IP (eipalloc-090425f83f912c8d6) to the new master instance. This involves associating the Elastic IP with the appropriate network interface (eni) of the new master.
Specific IP Address Association:
The Elastic IP is specifically associated with port1 of Fgt2. The message 'associate elastic ip eipalloc-090425f83f912c8d6 to 10.0.0.13 of eni eni-0f6b35f8fccd24eb0' indicates that the Elastic IP is now linked to the primary IP address (10.0.0.13) on port1 of the new master.
Other Options Analysis:
Option A is incorrect because the routing table update details are not explicitly stated.
Option C is incorrect because the IP address association mentioned relates to an Elastic IP, not eni-0b61d8afc0aefb8a2.
Option D is incorrect because it specifically mentions port2 for the Elastic IP association, which is not indicated in the debug output.
FortiGate HA Configuration Guide: FortiGate HA
An administrator has been asked to deploy an active-passive (A-P) FortiGate cluster in the AWS cloud across two availability zones.
In addition to enhanced redundancy, which other major difference is there compared to deploying A-P high availability in the same availability zone?
Enhanced Redundancy:
Deploying an active-passive (A-P) FortiGate cluster across two availability zones (AZs) provides enhanced redundancy by ensuring that if one AZ fails, the other can take over, maintaining high availability and uptime.
IP Addressing and Subnetting:
One of the major differences when deploying across different AZs compared to the same AZ is that IP addressing and subnetting are not shared between the instances. Each AZ operates independently with its own set of subnets and IP addresses, which must be managed separately (Option D).
Other Options Analysis:
Option A is incorrect because the FortiGate devices in an A-P setup do not act as a single logical instance; they operate in a failover setup.
Option B is incorrect because secondary IP address configuration is used in both single AZ and multi-AZ deployments.
Option C is incorrect because the number of subnets required is typically more when deploying across multiple AZs for redundancy.
FortiGate HA Configuration Guide: FortiGate HA
