At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate exam questions by Databricks. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Databricks Certified Machine Learning Associate Exam exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Databricks in their Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Databricks Certified Machine Learning Associate Exam exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
A new data scientist has started working on an existing machine learning project. The project is a scheduled Job that retrains every day. The project currently exists in a Repo in Databricks. The data scientist has been tasked with improving the feature engineering of the pipeline's preprocessing stage. The data scientist wants to make necessary updates to the code that can be easily adopted into the project without changing what is being run each day.
Which approach should the data scientist take to complete this task?
The best approach for the data scientist to take in this scenario is to create a new branch in Databricks, commit their changes, and push those changes to the Git provider. This approach allows the data scientist to make updates and improvements to the feature engineering part of the preprocessing pipeline without affecting the main codebase that runs daily. By creating a new branch, they can work on their changes in isolation. Once the changes are ready and tested, they can be merged back into the main branch through a pull request, ensuring a smooth integration process and allowing for code review and collaboration with other team members.
Databricks documentation on Git integration: Databricks Repos
A data scientist has a Spark DataFrame spark_df. They want to create a new Spark DataFrame that contains only the rows from spark_df where the value in column price is greater than 0.
Which of the following code blocks will accomplish this task?
To filter rows in a Spark DataFrame based on a condition, you use the filter method along with a column condition. The correct syntax in PySpark to accomplish this task is spark_df.filter(col('price') > 0), which filters the DataFrame to include only those rows where the value in the 'price' column is greater than 0. The col function is used to specify column-based operations. The other options provided either do not use correct Spark DataFrame syntax or are intended for different types of data manipulation frameworks like pandas. Reference:
PySpark DataFrame API documentation (Filtering DataFrames).
A data scientist uses 3-fold cross-validation when optimizing model hyperparameters for a regression problem. The following root-mean-squared-error values are calculated on each of the validation folds:
* 10.0
* 12.0
* 17.0
Which of the following values represents the overall cross-validation root-mean-squared error?
To calculate the overall cross-validation root-mean-squared error (RMSE), you average the RMSE values obtained from each validation fold. Given the RMSE values of 10.0, 12.0, and 17.0 for the three folds, the overall cross-validation RMSE is calculated as the average of these three values:
OverallCVRMSE=10.0+12.0+17.03=39.03=13.0OverallCVRMSE=310.0+12.0+17.0=339.0=13.0
Thus, the correct answer is 13.0, which accurately represents the average RMSE across all folds. Reference:
Cross-validation in Regression (Understanding Cross-Validation Metrics).
A data scientist wants to efficiently tune the hyperparameters of a scikit-learn model. They elect to use the Hyperopt library's fmin operation to facilitate this process. Unfortunately, the final model is not very accurate. The data scientist suspects that there is an issue with the objective_function being passed as an argument to fmin.
They use the following code block to create the objective_function:
Which of the following changes does the data scientist need to make to their objective_function in order to produce a more accurate model?
When using the Hyperopt library with fmin, the goal is to find the minimum of the objective function. Since you are using cross_val_score to calculate the R2 score which is a measure of the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable(s) in a regression model, higher values are better. However, fmin seeks to minimize the objective function, so to align with fmin's goal, you should return the negative of the R2 score (-r2). This way, by minimizing the negative R2, fmin is effectively maximizing the R2 score, which can lead to a more accurate model.
Reference
Hyperopt Documentation: http://hyperopt.github.io/hyperopt/
Scikit-Learn documentation on model evaluation: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/model_evaluation.html
A data scientist has written a data cleaning notebook that utilizes the pandas library, but their colleague has suggested that they refactor their notebook to scale with big data.
Which of the following approaches can the data scientist take to spend the least amount of time refactoring their notebook to scale with big data?
The data scientist can refactor their notebook to utilize the pandas API on Spark (now known as pandas on Spark, formerly Koalas). This allows for the least amount of changes to the existing pandas-based code while scaling to handle big data using Spark's distributed computing capabilities. pandas on Spark provides a similar API to pandas, making the transition smoother and faster compared to completely rewriting the code to use PySpark DataFrame API, Scala Dataset API, or Spark SQL. Reference:
Databricks documentation on pandas API on Spark (formerly Koalas).
