At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the CIPS L6M1 exam questions by CIPS. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the CIPS Strategic Ethical Leadership exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by CIPS in their CIPS L6M1 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their CIPS Strategic Ethical Leadership exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the CIPS L6M1 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
SIMULATION
Explain how stress in the workplace can impact upon employees. What are factors that can lead to stress in the workplace and how can an organisation look after its workforce when it comes to reducing stress? (25 points).
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Intro -- stress has impacts both for employee and employer
P1 -- how stress impacts on employees
P2 -- factors that lead to stress -- quote HSE
P3 -- how an organisation can look after workforce
Conclusion -- stress has far reaching consequences
Example Essay
Workplace stress is a prevalent issue that can have profound effects on employees and organizational performance. Stress arises from various sources and can significantly impact an individual's well-being, productivity, and job satisfaction. Recognizing the importance of addressing workplace stress, organizations have adopted strategies to mitigate its adverse effects. This essay explores the impact of workplace stress on employees, the factors contributing to stress, and organizational strategies for stress reduction.
Impact of Workplace Stress on Employees:
Physical Health Effects: Persistent workplace stress can lead to physical health issues such as headaches, digestive problems, and hypertension. In extreme cases, it has been known for stress to cause heart-attacks.
Mental Health Implications: Stress is closely linked to mental health disorders like anxiety and depression. Employees experiencing high levels of stress are at greater risk of developing these conditions, leading to decreased concentration, motivation, and overall job satisfaction.
Decreased Productivity: Stressed employees often find it challenging to focus on tasks, leading to reduced productivity and lower quality work. This can affect project timelines and overall organizational performance.
Increased Absenteeism: Stress-related illnesses can lead to increased absenteeism, impacting team dynamics and workload distribution. Absences can also result in increased costs for organizations.
Low Morale and Job Satisfaction: A stressed workforce may experience reduced job satisfaction and morale. This can lead to decreased engagement, a higher turnover rate, and difficulties in attracting and retaining talent.
Factors Contributing to Workplace Stress: The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Management Standards of 2003 have identified six causes of work-related stress:
Lack of Support: Insufficient support from supervisors or peers can exacerbate stress, as employees may feel isolated and unsupported in challenging situations.
Excessive Workload (Demands): High workloads, unrealistic deadlines, and excessive overtime can overwhelm employees, leading to stress.
Lack of Control: Employees who have limited autonomy or decision-making authority may feel stressed due to a perceived lack of control over their work.
Role Ambiguity: Unclear job roles and responsibilities can create confusion and stress, as employees struggle to meet undefined expectations.
Change and Uncertainty: Frequent organizational changes, such as restructuring or layoffs, can create job insecurity and stress among employees.
Workplace Relationships: Poor relationships with colleagues or supervisors can contribute significantly to workplace stress. For example bullying or harassment in the workplace.
Organizational Strategies for Stress Reduction:
HSE Management Standards: Organizations can adopt the HSE Management Standards as a framework to identify and address stressors. This involves assessing workplace conditions related to the six stress factors and taking action to improve them.
Mental Health Support: Offer employee assistance programs (EAPs), mental health resources, and counselling services to help employees cope with stress and mental health challenges.
Training and Education: Provide training on stress management, resilience, and work-life balance to empower employees with coping strategies.
Workload Management: Ensure workload distribution is reasonable and aligned with employees' capabilities. Encourage breaks and discourage excessive overtime.
Communication: Promote open and transparent communication channels to address concerns, clarify roles, and keep employees informed about organizational changes.
Flexible Working Arrangements: Offer flexible working options, such as remote work or flexible hours, to help employees achieve a better work-life balance.
Leadership Training: Train managers to recognize signs of stress, provide support, and create a supportive and inclusive work environment.
In conclusion, workplace stress has far-reaching consequences on employees and organizational outcomes. A recent study by CIPD has shown that stress is the leading cause of long-term absence from work. Recognizing the sources of stress, organizations can implement strategies, and use the HSE Management Standards, to mitigate its impact. By fostering a supportive and healthy work environment, organizations can reduce stress levels, enhance employee well-being, and improve overall performance.
Tutor Notes
- I really wanted to add studying for CIPS when you have a full-time job is a factor that can lead to stress in the workplace. It's definitely not a wrong answer, but an examiner may not share my sense of humour haha
- I've chosen to write this essay in bullet points to show you how it can be done. This is a useful style if you're running out of time, and if English isn't your first language. The important thing with answering CIPS questions is to actually answer the question. You don't need 'posh' language like 'furthermore' and 'moreover'. You can get a good score by writing simply and succinctly.
- HSE Management Standards 2003 identifies six causes of work-related stress that I wrote about above. Here's a fun mnemonic to help you learn them: - SDCRRC -- stress does create really crappy realities
- The study guide doesn't talk about this, but you could mention Mental Health First Aid Courses, which are growing in popularity, and also the use of confidential counselling.
- Your essay could have mentioned Hatton vs Sutherland (2002). This case is an important precedent -- it shows that just because a workplace offers confidential counselling to employees, this does not negate responsibility for employee stress -- the company is still liable for causing you stress.
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical. How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Assessing Readiness for Change and Decision-Making: Fred's Approach as Head of Procurement
Fred's recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department's readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
1. Understanding the Organizational Culture
Fred should assess whether the company culture supports innovation and change or prefers stability and routine.
Indicators of Readiness: A culture that embraces innovation and continuous improvement.
Employees who actively propose new ideas and improvements.
Potential Barriers: A culture resistant to change, where employees prefer 'the way things have always been done.'
A history of failed change initiatives, causing skepticism.
Assessment Method:
Surveys or feedback sessions to gauge employee attitudes toward change.
Observing past change efforts---were they successful or met with resistance?
2. Evaluating Employee Buy-in and Mindset
Fred needs to assess whether employees are open to new ways of working or if they fear change due to job security concerns, workload increases, or lack of skills.
Indicators of Readiness: Employees express willingness to adopt new tools and processes.
Staff members demonstrate adaptability to past procedural updates.
Potential Barriers: Employees fear that changes might make their jobs redundant.
Resistance due to lack of understanding or training.
Assessment Method:
Conduct one-on-one discussions or anonymous surveys on employee perceptions of change.
Identify change champions who are enthusiastic about improvements.
3. Analyzing Current Processes and Pain Points
Before implementing radical changes, Fred must determine if current procurement processes are inefficient or if employees feel the need for change.
Indicators of Readiness: Procurement staff express frustration with outdated systems.
Frequent delays, bottlenecks, or inefficiencies in procurement processes.
Potential Barriers: Employees feel the current processes work well enough and resist changing them.
Lack of data to justify why new processes would be better than existing ones.
Assessment Method:
Conduct a process audit to evaluate inefficiencies.
Use KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) to measure procurement effectiveness.
4. Assessing Resource Availability
Even if the department is open to change, Fred must ensure there are sufficient resources (budget, technology, and expertise) to implement his ideas.
Indicators of Readiness: A budget exists to invest in new tools, training, or staff.
The organization is willing to commit resources for change implementation.
Potential Barriers: Limited financial resources may delay or scale down initiatives.
Employees lack the technical skills to adapt to new procurement methods.
Assessment Method:
Check the procurement budget and forecast costs for proposed changes.
Evaluate if the current team has the skills needed or requires training.
5. Leadership and Senior Management Support
Without support from senior management, Fred's efforts may not succeed. He must assess how committed leadership is to change.
Indicators of Readiness: Senior leaders prioritize procurement transformation.
Executives provide clear sponsorship and communication about improvements.
Potential Barriers: Leaders have competing priorities and are not fully committed.
Conflicting objectives between departments slow down decision-making.
Assessment Method:
Schedule meetings with senior management to discuss alignment.
Seek an executive sponsor to advocate for procurement reforms.
How Readiness Assessment Impacts Fred's Decision-Making
After evaluating the department's change readiness, Fred's approach to implementing changes will depend on the findings.
1. If Readiness is High:
Fred can proceed with bigger, transformative changes.
He can introduce automation tools, new supplier strategies, or restructuring initiatives.
A detailed change management plan should be developed, outlining: Timelines for implementation.
Training programs to upskill employees.
Performance metrics to track improvements.
2. If Readiness is Moderate:
Fred should implement gradual, phased changes rather than radical reforms.
He may need to educate employees on the benefits of change before pushing large initiatives.
Focus on quick wins that build momentum, such as: Small process optimizations.
Minor policy adjustments.
Pilot projects to test new ideas before full-scale rollout.
3. If Readiness is Low:
Fred must address employee concerns first before implementing major changes.
He should focus on communication and engagement to create a culture more open to change.
Strategies to increase readiness include: Organizing workshops and discussions to explain the need for change.
Showcasing case studies of successful procurement transformations.
Gaining senior leadership support to drive top-down change.
Conclusion
For Fred to successfully implement his procurement transformation ideas, he must first assess whether the department is ready for change. By evaluating organizational culture, employee mindset, process efficiency, resource availability, and senior management support, he can determine the right strategy---whether to proceed with radical changes, implement gradual improvements, or first increase change readiness. His decisions should be guided by employee engagement, clear communication, and alignment with business goals, ensuring that changes enhance procurement efficiency without causing unnecessary disruption.
SIMULATION
Explain how Modern Slavery is a risk to a supply chain and possible ways a Supply Chain Manager can mitigate this risk (25 points)
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction -- modern slavery is an issue due to complex international supply chains
P1 -- risk -- subcontracting or outsourcing
P2 -- risk -- lack of visibility
P3 - risk - other countries not having strong laws against it
P4 -- mitigate -- supplier due diligence
P5 -- mitigate -- traceability e.g. blockchain
P6 -- mitigate -- training
P7 -- mitigate -- collaboration and reporting
P8 -- example -- DJ Houghton
Conclusion -- modern slavery is risk legally and ethically and also to business reputation
Example Essay
Modern slavery, a grave violation of human rights, poses a significant risk to supply chains across the globe. As organizations increasingly rely on complex and globalized supply networks, the risk of unwittingly engaging with suppliers that exploit forced labour and human trafficking becomes ever more concerning. This essay explores the risks associated with modern slavery in the supply chain and suggests possible mitigation strategies for supply chain managers. To illustrate the real-world implications of these risks, I will reference the legal case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd.
Modern slavery, which includes practices like forced labour and human trafficking, can infiltrate supply chains in various ways. One significant entry point is through subcontracting and outsourcing. As supply chains become increasingly complex, organizations often rely on subcontractors and suppliers further down the chain. Unfortunately, these lower-tier suppliers may engage in exploitative labour practices to cut costs, which can go unnoticed by the primary organization.
Moreover, the lack of transparency within supply chains poses a considerable risk. Limited visibility into sub-tier suppliers and subcontractors makes it challenging to assess their labour practices. This lack of transparency creates opportunities for modern slavery to thrive undetected, posing a significant risk to organizations and their stakeholders.
Additionally, globalization plays a role in the risk equation. Sourcing materials and products internationally increases the risk of encountering suppliers operating in regions with weaker labour protections and lax enforcement of anti-slavery laws. This is particularly true in countries with less stringent child working laws such as in South East Asia.
Supply chain managers play a crucial role in identifying and mitigating the risk of modern slavery in the supply chain. Several strategies can be employed to address this risk effectively:
Firstly, comprehensive supplier due diligence is paramount. This involves conducting thorough assessments of suppliers, including lower-tier suppliers, to evaluate their labour practices, compliance with anti-slavery laws, and adherence to ethical standards. It also entails implementing regular audits and inspections of suppliers to ensure compliance with labour laws and ethical standards. An organisation can employ a third party to conduct these audits, to ensure that the results are authentic.
Secondly, establishing transparency and traceability within the supply chain is essential. This can be achieved by meticulously mapping the supply chain, identifying potential risks, and ensuring visibility into lower-tier suppliers. Modern technology, such as blockchain and supply chain management software, can be instrumental in tracking and tracing the origins of products and materials.
Thirdly, organizations should develop and communicate a robust supplier code of conduct that explicitly prohibits modern slavery and outlines the consequences for non-compliance. Encouraging suppliers to adopt similar codes of conduct within their own operations can help create a network of ethical supply chain partners.
Moreover, regular risk assessments and impact analyses are critical. These assessments should consider geographical, industry-specific, and supplier-specific factors and help organizations understand the potential consequences of modern slavery-related risks on their reputation and bottom line.
Training and education are also essential components of mitigation strategies. Employees and suppliers should be educated on identifying and reporting instances of modern slavery, and awareness should be raised about the legal and ethical obligations surrounding this issue.
Lastly, collaboration and reporting are crucial. Organizations should collaborate with industry associations, NGOs, and government bodies to share best practices and improve industry-wide efforts against modern slavery. Transparent reporting on efforts to mitigate modern slavery risks demonstrates a commitment to addressing the issue and fosters trust with stakeholders.
The case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd serves as a stark reminder of the potential legal consequences of failing to address modern slavery in the supply chain. In this case, the court found that the company, DJ Houghton Ltd, had subjected workers to deplorable working conditions, effectively amounting to modern slavery. What sets this case apart is that the court held the directors personally liable for breaches of their duty of care to the workers. This case underscores the legal liabilities and reputational damage that organizations and their leadership can face if they neglect their responsibilities in the supply chain.
In Conclusion, modern slavery poses a significant risk to supply chains, jeopardizing ethical values, legal compliance, and corporate reputations. Supply chain managers have a crucial role in identifying and mitigating this risk by implementing due diligence, transparency measures, and ethical standards. By taking proactive steps to combat modern slavery, supply chain managers can protect their organizations and uphold their moral and legal obligations in an increasingly interconnected global economy. The case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd serves as a compelling reminder of the real-world consequences of failing to address this critical issue
Tutor Notes
- Your answer may also make reference to ethical standards and accreditations such as Fair Trade, using the CIPS Code of Conduct, Modern Slavery Act, having a strong CSR policy, appointing an ethical Ombudsman, ILO Conventions and the 2018 Decent Work Agenda, SA8000. Mentioning these extra bits would likely get you a distinction.
SIMULATION
Discuss the role that independent organisations in the third sector can play with regards to ethical business practices. Your answer may make reference to one or more of the following: United Nations, Tradecraft UK, Walk Free Foundation, IMF, ILO. (25 points)
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction -- what is the 3rd sector?
P1 -- role of advocate -- promoting ethical business practices
P2 -- role of watchdog
P3 -- role of researcher -- example of UNICEF and Cocoa
P4 -- role of influencing global policies e.g. ILO Decent Work Agenda
P5 -- Decent Work Agenda -- explanation
Conclusion -- work of third sector is critical to support advances in ethical business practices
Example Essay
Independent organizations in the third sector, also known as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society groups, play a crucial role in promoting ethical business practices on a global scale. This essay explores the multifaceted role of independent organizations in advancing ethical business practices and will focus on the work of the United Nations and the International Labour Organization (ILO).
Independent organizations in the third sector serve as advocates for ethical business practices. They raise awareness about ethical issues, such as fair labour practices, environmental sustainability, and responsible supply chain management. By conducting research, publishing reports, and engaging in public discourse, these organizations bring attention to areas where ethical improvements are needed.
Moreover, independent organizations often act as watchdogs, monitoring the actions of businesses and governments to ensure adherence to ethical standards. They use tools like corporate social responsibility (CSR) evaluations and human rights impact assessments to hold organizations accountable for their practices. For instance, NGOs may investigate and expose cases of labour exploitation or environmental violations in global supply chains.
For example, the International Labour Organization (ILO), a specialized agency of the United Nations, initiated efforts to combat child labour and forced labour in the cocoa industry. Children, often working in hazardous conditions, were involved in harvesting cocoa beans, which raised serious ethical and human rights concerns . The ILO along with UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) conducted studies, surveys, and assessments to gather data on child labour and forced labour. This resulted in the creation of the Harkin-Engel Protocol. Under the protocol, the chocolate and cocoa industry committed to taking specific actions to eliminate the worst forms of child labour and forced labour from cocoa production, encouraging businesses to adopt responsible sourcing practices, implement traceability measures, and invest in community development programs. While challenges persist, ILO/ UNICEF's efforts have contributed to significant improvements in labour conditions and a greater emphasis on ethical practices in the cocoa supply chain.
Furthermore, the United Nations, particularly the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), provides a platform for independent organizations to engage with governments and international institutions on ethical business practices. ECOSOC consults with NGOs, enabling them to contribute to discussions on sustainable development goals, human rights, and economic policies. This engagement ensures that ethical considerations are integrated into global policymaking.
Another example of how third sector organisations contribute to ethical business practices is theInternational Labour Organization (ILO) conventions, such as the 2018 Decent Work Agend
a. This framework encompasses four main pillars
1) Employment: creating jobs and expanding opportunities for all. The goal is to promote full and productive employment, ensure equal pay for equal work, and reduce informal employment. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing unemployment, underemployment, and vulnerable employment, particularly in developing countries.
2) Social Protection: it highlights the need for comprehensive social protection systems. This includes access to essential health services, maternity protection, unemployment benefits, disability benefits, and pensions. Social protection helps individuals and families cope with various economic and social risks.
3) Social Dialogue: the active participation of workers, employers, and governments in decision-making processes related to labour policies and regulations. Social dialogue is essential for achieving fair and equitable labour practices, including collective bargaining and labour rights.
4) Rights at Work: the right to freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, the elimination of forced labour and child labour, and the elimination of discrimination in the workplace. Ensuring these rights helps create a fair and just work environment.
The Decent Work Agenda represents a comprehensive and integrated approach to labour and employment issues, aiming to improve the well-being of workers and their families while fostering economic growth and development. It addresses the challenges and opportunities arising from changes in the world of work, such as globalization, technological advancements, and demographic shifts.
In conclusion, independent organizations in the third sector are instrumental in advancing ethical business practices globally. Their roles as advocates, monitors, collaborators, and educators are essential in holding businesses and governments accountable for their actions. Through engagement with institutions like the United Nations and initiatives like the ILO's Decent Work Agenda, these organizations contribute to the promotion of ethical practices in business, fostering a more just and sustainable global economy. Their efforts complement the broader goals of achieving social responsibility, human rights, and environmental sustainability in the business world.
Tutor Notes
- Out of those listed, you could get a lot of content out of the UN and ILO (remember the ILO is part of the UN). These would be my personal choice to pick and learn about because there are lots of examples you could talk about. I chose Cocoa and Child Labour. Other things you could have wrote about include:
- ILO Convention No. 29 (Forced Labour Convention, 1930): This convention requires member states to suppress the use of forced labour in all its forms, including slavery, debt bondage, and forced or compulsory labour.
- ILO Convention No. 105 (Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957): This convention complements Convention No. 29 and aims to abolish forced labour through measures such as effective enforcement of laws and policies.
- Goal 8 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) specifically targets decent work and economic growth. Target 8.7 within this goal calls for the 'immediate and effective measures to eradicate forced labour, end modern slavery and human trafficking and secure the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour.' The UN promotes the SDGs as a framework for addressing forced labour and related issues.
- The UN provides technical assistance to countries, helping them develop and implement legislation and policies to combat forced labour. This assistance includes capacity building, training, and sharing best practices.
- Tradecraft UK, Walk Free and IMF are also mentioned in the study guide. Here's some info you could have included if you wished to talk about them in your essay:
SIMULATION
What is situational leadership? (5 points) Discuss and evaluate how this approach may be used in supply chain management (20 points)
Introduction
Leadership effectiveness depends on how well a leader adapts to changing situations, team capabilities, and organizational needs. Situational Leadership, developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, is a flexible leadership model that suggests no single leadership style is best in all situations. Instead, leaders must adapt their approach based on the maturity, competence, and motivation of their team members.
In the context of supply chain management, where conditions are constantly evolving due to market dynamics, supplier relationships, technological changes, and risk factors, situational leadership is a highly relevant approach.
1. What is Situational Leadership? (5 Points)
Definition
Situational Leadership is a contingency-based leadership model that suggests leaders should adjust their leadership style based on the specific situation and the readiness level of their team members.
Key Concept: Leadership Styles Based on Team Readiness
The Situational Leadership Model identifies four leadership styles, which are determined by a combination of directive (task-oriented) and supportive (relationship-oriented) behaviors:
Why Situational Leadership is Important?
Encourages flexibility in leadership.
Helps develop employees' skills and confidence.
Ensures effective leadership in changing environments like supply chain management.
2. How Situational Leadership Applies to Supply Chain Management (20 Points)
Supply Chain Management Overview
Supply chain management (SCM) involves planning, procurement, logistics, inventory management, risk assessment, and supplier relationships. Given the fast-changing nature of supply chains, managers must adapt their leadership style based on team capabilities, supplier maturity, and operational challenges.
Situational Leadership Applied to Supply Chain Functions
1. Telling (S1) -- Directive Leadership for New or Inexperienced Teams
Application in Supply Chain:
Best for new supply chain employees who need strict guidance on procurement, contract management, and compliance.
Works well in structured environments, such as warehouse management and logistics operations, where standard operating procedures (SOPs) must be followed.
Example:
A newly hired procurement officer struggling with contract negotiation may need step-by-step instructions from a senior manager to ensure compliance with procurement regulations.
2. Selling (S2) -- Coaching Approach for Semi-Skilled Supply Chain Teams
Application in Supply Chain:
Used when employees have some knowledge but need motivation and guidance.
Effective in supplier relationship management, where procurement staff need training on negotiation techniques and ethical sourcing.
Helps employees understand the bigger picture and improve decision-making skills.
Example:
A procurement team transitioning to a digital procurement system may need training, encouragement, and strategic direction to adopt new technologies.
3. Participating (S3) -- Collaboration in Strategic Supply Chain Decisions
Application in Supply Chain:
Works best for experienced supply chain professionals who need empowerment and involvement in decision-making.
Encourages team input on strategic decisions, such as risk management, cost optimization, and sustainability initiatives.
Best for cross-functional collaboration, where procurement, logistics, and finance teams work together.
Example:
A supply chain manager engaging with senior procurement professionals to co-develop a supplier diversification strategy to reduce dependency on a single supplier.
4. Delegating (S4) -- Empowering High-Performing Supply Chain Teams
Application in Supply Chain:
Best for highly experienced and autonomous supply chain professionals who require minimal supervision.
Used in global supply chain operations, where regional managers handle logistics, procurement, and supplier engagement independently.
Encourages innovation, allowing supply chain teams to optimize processes using AI, automation, and data analytics.
Example:
A senior procurement manager overseeing global supplier contracts operates with full autonomy and implements a digital supplier performance dashboard without needing daily oversight.
3. Advantages and Challenges of Situational Leadership in SCM
Conclusion
Situational leadership is a highly effective approach for supply chain management, where dynamic conditions require flexible leadership styles. By adjusting leadership approaches based on team competency, motivation, and operational needs, supply chain leaders can optimize procurement, logistics, and supplier relationship management.
The most effective supply chain leaders use all four styles, applying:
Telling (S1) for new procurement staff,
Selling (S2) for skill-building in supplier management,
Participating (S3) for strategic decision-making, and
Delegating (S4) for experienced global supply chain teams.
By mastering situational leadership, procurement and supply chain managers can increase efficiency, reduce risks, and improve supplier partnerships, ultimately enhancing organizational success.
