Bottom of Form

Top of Form

- This is an open question. You could really talk about anything. Here's some ideas of content:

Example Essay

The public and private sectors, while both essential to a nation's economy, operate under different paradigms, primarily due to their distinct drivers, stakeholders, regulations, procurement aims, and supplier relationships.

Drivers

The most fundamental difference lies in their drivers. Private sector organizations are primarily profit-driven; their existence hinges on their ability to generate profits. This profit influences their strategies, operations, and overall objectives. Conversely, public sector organizations are not driven by profit. Funded by taxpayer money, their primary objective is to deliver services effectively and efficiently to the public. Their success is measured not in financial terms, but in how well they meet the service levels required by the citizens who finance them through taxes.

Stakeholders

The range and influence of stakeholders in the two sectors also differ markedly. In the public sector, the stakeholder base is much broader, encompassing every member of society who interacts with or benefits from public services like healthcare, policing, and road maintenance. However, these stakeholders typically have less power to influence policy or practices. In contrast, stakeholders in the private sector, such as shareholders and customers, often have a more significant influence on company policies and practices. The private sector's narrower stakeholder base allows for more direct impact and influence from these groups.

Regulations

Regulations in the public sector are generally more stringent than in the private sector. Public sector entities, governed by regulations like PCR 2015, must demonstrate sound procurement practices and are accountable to society at large. This contrasts with the private sector, where companies have more latitude in choosing suppliers and are not obliged to justify their decisions publicly. The private sector faces fewer regulatory constraints, allowing for more flexibility in business decisions.

Procurement Aims

Procurement in the public sector is guided by the principles of efficiency, economy, and effectiveness, often summarized as the '3 Es'. The focus is on achieving value for money, considering both quality and price. In contrast, private sector procurement is more diverse in its aims, reflecting the organization's specific goals, which could range from profit maximization to innovation or sustainability. The private sector's procurement decisions are more closely aligned with the organization's unique values and objectives.

Supplier Relationships

Finally, the nature of supplier relationships differs significantly between the two sectors. The public sector is mandated to maintain a certain distance from its suppliers, ensuring equal treatment and open competition, as dictated by regulations like the PCR. This contrasts with the private sector, where companies are free to develop closer, more strategic relationships with preferred suppliers. The private sector can engage in practices like partnerships and Early Supplier Involvement, which are typically not permissible in the public sector due to the need for impartiality and fairness.

In summary, while both sectors aim to deliver services or products effectively, the public sector's focus on service delivery for the public good, stringent regulations, broad stakeholder base, and specific procurement principles, sets it apart from the private sector's profit-driven, flexible, and more narrowly focused approach.

Tutor Notes

- At Level 4 the questions are usually explain or describe, so don't worry too much about doing an in depth 'compare and contrast' style of answer. They don't expect that level of detail here. Simply saying Public Sector does X and Private Sector does Y is all you need.

- I have mentioned PCR 2015 -- if you're taking this exam in 2025 you may need to update this reference with the new regulations.

- LO 4.3 p.220 / p. 226

How to approach this question:

- This is quite an open question and there are many different things you could mention. One way to approach it would be to use Carter's 10 Cs- discuss a couple of these. OR just give a couple of criteria in different paragraphs. Some ideas include: Supplier financial status, Reputation / References, Quality, Availability, CSR Policies / Ethics / Environmental considerations, Accreditations, Added Value. This list is not exhaustive.

- If you're going for Carter's 10 Cs you could name a couple of these: competency, consistency, capability, control, cost, cash, clean, communication, culture, commitment

- I don't think either approach is better or worse. Choose the criteria you know the most about and write about those.

- The question doesn't tell you how many criteria to name, so you have to make a judgement call here. I would aim for 5-6. But if you can only remember 4 that's fine. The main thing they're looking for is that you explain for each one 1) what it is 2) how procurement can check 3) why procurement would look at that criteria 4) an example. If you do too many you risk not going into enough detail on each. It's a balance. 5 is always a good number to aim for if the question doesn't state.

Example Essay

In the procurement cycle, the supplier selection phase is a critical juncture that demands consideration. Procurement Managers shoulder the responsibility of identifying and awarding contracts to suppliers who not only meet immediate needs, but contribute to the long-term success of the organization. This essay explores various criteria a Procurement Manager can employ to ensure the selection of the best supplier: financial stability, reputation, quality, availability, CSR policies, and added value.

Financial stability is a foundational criterion in supplier selection. Assessing a supplier's financial status involves a multifaceted evaluation, with liquidity and gearing ratio taking center stage. The acid test, comparing short-term assets to liabilities, offers insights into a supplier's ability to settle debts promptly, with a ratio exceeding 1 indicating financial health. Meanwhile, the gearing ratio, reflecting the proportion of capital funded by loans, aids in gauging financial risk, with a ratio below 50% considered low-risk. Relying on published Profit and Loss statements and income statements, along with financial credit checks from platforms like Dun and Bradstreet, empowers Procurement Managers to make informed decisions. This financial scrutiny is imperative to avoid entering contracts with suppliers facing imminent financial struggles, safeguarding against potential disruptions to the supply chain.

Reputation and references are another pivotal criterion. Seeking references from previous contracts allows Procurement Managers to gauge a supplier's track record in successfully delivering on similar commitments. Independent reviews and informal market inquiries supplement this information, providing a holistic understanding of a supplier's performance. However, caution is advised in overreliance on past performance, as variables like personnel changes or contract scale differences may impact outcomes. Recognizing that past shortcomings may have been addressed internally further emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to reference evaluation.

Thirdly, Quality. Beyond the product itself, considerations extend to the supplier's technological capabilities, manufacturing processes, and relevant accreditations such as ISO 9001. Physical visits to supplier sites may be warranted, especially for products like raw materials where samples can be requested. Adhering to recognized safety standards and assessing factors like fire retardancy ensures that the quality of manufactured goods aligns with established benchmarks.

Next, Availability is another important criteria to consider. Procurement Managers must evaluate a supplier's capacity and capability to meet specific requirements. Inquiries about existing contracts and flexibility in response to demand fluctuations provide insights into a supplier's commitment and responsiveness. Assessing the supplier's workload and the significance of the buyer in their client portfolio helps determine the level of attention and service the buyer can expect. A buyer may wish to avoid working for a supplier who is already stretched very thinly with other contracts.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies and ethical considerations have gained prominence in supplier selection. Beyond legal compliance, Procurement Managers may scrutinize a supplier's history for convictions or negative press related to corruption, bribery, or fraud. The presence of a Modern Slavery Policy and Environmental Policy, along with relevant accreditations like ISO14001 or Fair Trade certification, attests to a supplier's commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. Procurement would likely seek to appoint a supplier who's CSR vision aligns with their own company's.

Lastly, added value is an important criteria to consider. This is particularly so for Public Sector Organizations governed by the Social Value Act. In addition to meeting contractual requirements, suppliers may offer knowledge sharing, training, improved processes, or contribute to social value by employing local community members or providing apprenticeships. This criterion aligns procurement decisions with broader organizational goals, enhancing the overall impact of supplier relationships and benefitting the local community.

In conclusion, a careful combination of financial scrutiny, reputation assessment, quality evaluation, availability considerations, CSR policies, and added value analysis forms the bedrock of effective supplier selection in the procurement cycle. Procurement Managers, armed with a holistic understanding of these criteria, should seek not only to fulfil immediate needs, but also consider the long-term impact of supplier appointments.

Tutor Notes

- A 'good' scoring answer (50-70%) will explain the criteria well and give examples. If you're looking for a distinction level answer (70% +) you could also mention advantages, disadvantages and risks associated with each of the criteri

a. For example, when looking at references and reputation it's important to know that a supplier would only ever provide a good reference to you, they would never tell you of a contract that failed. Another example is that financial data may be skewed- a supplier may have a low score if they are just starting up or have recently remortgaged a property. It's therefore important to get a commentary as well as the figures / scores.

- You could also mention that criteria could be weighted e.g. more importance given to quality than financial status and also consider how easy or difficult it would be to get the information e.g. a supplier may say they have lots of availability to deliver the service you require, but they may just be saying this to win business. How do you know for sure?

- Social Value Act isn't in this syllabus. If you work in Public Sector procurement it's something you'll be very familiar with. If you don't or you're outside of the UK do not worry about this. I've just included it to show how you can bring in your own knowledge to questions like this. You could think of particular criteria that's important to your industry and write about that. The Social Value Act: What is it, and why is it important? (samtaler.co.uk)

- Study guide p.77

- Definition of P2P - Purchase to Pay or Procure to Pay is the process an organisation takes from ordering a product to paying for it. The main stages of this process are product ordering, supplier requisition to pay, budget authorisation, receipt of delivery, and invoice processing.

- Impact of using IT Systems -- can include the use of these systems: EPOS, barcodes/ RDIF, e-commerce systems such as POs and invoicing, and electronic communications such as email. Impacts can be; increased productivity, quicker processes, higher levels of visibility, increased responsiveness to demands, cost savings, less paper used, supplier relationships are managed virtually rather than in person. Generally the impacts are positive, but you could also discuss some disadvantages or challenges a department might face as the question is quite open.

Example Essay

A Procure-to-Pay system is a comprehensive solution that automates and integrates the procurement process within an organization, covering the entire lifecycle from requisitioning goods or services to making payments to suppliers.

The P2P process includes the following: a buyer requests an item, they put in a requisition, it is accepted by the supplier, the item is delivered and the item is then paid for. The order of the steps may be different depending on the industry / requirement (e.g. sometimes payment is made before delivery), or sometimes there are additional steps such as getting the requisition approved by a manager.

Nowadays the P2P process is mainly digitalised- orders are made online or via a PO system and payment is made via BACS. It is not common to pay for items in cash or by cheque any more. This digitalisation has had many effects on the way the procurement department functions. The P2P system streamlines and standardizes the purchasing process, enhancing efficiency, transparency, and control.

The integration of Information Technology (IT) systems has a profound impact on the functioning of the Procurement department within an organization. This digital transformation brings about significant improvements in efficiency, transparency, collaboration, and decision-making processes. Some of the key impacts include:

- Raised productivity -- using IT systems results in quicker processes and they're often more accurate and consistent than humans doing the tasks manually. For example, an electronic requisition system can flag when a requisition isn't completed properly (e.g. part of the requisition is missing or a supplier name has been spelled incorrectly). When doing this manually the errors may not be spotted.

- Innovation -- the use of IT means new avenues can be explored in terms of new product markets and new supply chains. Without the use of IT, procurement may be limited to working with local suppliers or those they can find in the phone book. Using IT systems such as e-auctions and even just the internet to complete research, opens up more opportunities to make purchases. This could involve working with international supply chains and result in cost savings for the business.

- Improved business processes -- the use of IT means there is more transparency as everything is recorded and it is easier for managers to oversee. This results in less risk exposure for the business, particularly in fraud. The use of IT also standardises processes which makes it easy for everyone to know what to do.

- When IT is used, there is an increased responsiveness of the procurement function -- it allows for 24/7/365 ordering compared to making purchases in person in a shop which may only be open 9-5. Moreover , there are paperless communications when IT is used-- this has a positive environmental impact

- Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) - IT systems support Supplier Relationship Management by providing tools to assess and manage supplier performance. This can include logging KPIs and tracking supplier performance. SRM functionalities enhance communication, collaboration, and visibility into supplier relationships.

In summary, the integration of IT systems into the Procurement department transforms traditional practices, making processes more streamlined, data-driven, and strategically focused. The impact is not only on operational efficiency but also on the ability of the procurement function to contribute strategically to the organization's overall objectives.

Tutor Notes

- The word impact is quite vague. I've mainly talked about advantages but you could discuss the impact that the use of IT has had on the department, not just in how it functions, but in how it is perceived. IT has professionalised the procurement industry as a whole- it's no longer seen as 'purchasing' but as a vital function within a business that contributes to added value and strategic goals.

- You could also talk about the impact it's had on ways of working. The use of IT has allowed for innovative procurement and manufacturing techniques such as Just-In-Time.The use of IT also ends silo-working, instead allowing for more collaboration with other business departments and the supply chain as a whole.

- LO 3.4 P. 171

- The question is asking you to explain the following:

- With this type of question you would be expected to discuss 3- 5 differences, giving examples.

Example Essay Structure

Introduction -- explain what is meant by 'procurement' and 'SCM' -- procurement is the traditional way and is to do with purchasing goods, SCM is the new way which is a more multifaceted way of securing goods and is the result of longer, more complex and more globalised supply chains.

Paragraph 1 -- the objectives of each approach (5 Rights vs added value)

Paragraph 2 -- the approach (reactive buying vs proactive ordering)

Paragraph 3 - the way of working (silo working vs cross-functional working)

Paragraph 4 -- the relationships with suppliers (transactional vs collaborative)

Conclusion -- There are many differences between the two approaches, and different companies may favour one over the other depending on their specific circumstances. E.g. small organisations that make low value and low risk purchases may take a traditional procurement approach and large multi-national organisations may require a SRM approach due to the volume of suppliers and com-plexities of the supply chains.

Example essay:

Procurement and Supply Chain Management (SCM) represent two distinct approaches to acquiring goods, reflecting the evolution of purchasing practices. Procurement, the traditional method, in-volves the straightforward purchase of goods. In contrast, SCM is a more intricate approach, born out of longer, more complex, and globalized supply chains. This essay explores the main differences between these two approaches, highlighting their objectives, methods, ways of working, and suppli-er relationships.

In the traditional procurement approach, the focus is on achieving the '5 Rights' -- getting the right goods, in the right quantity, at the right quality, for the right price, and at the right time. This en-sures efficiency in the purchasing process. On the other hand, SCM goes beyond these basic objec-tives, aiming to add value to the entire supply chain. This might involve developing strategic rela-tionships with suppliers, ensuring sustainability, and aligning with broader organizational goals. For example, a company employing a traditional procurement approach might emphasize getting the lowest price, while an SCM approach could involve working with suppliers to enhance product in-novation or reduce environmental impact.

Secondly, the traditional procurement approach is often reactive, responding to immediate needs or demands. Companies using this method typically make purchases as required, without a long-term strategy. In contrast, SCM involves proactive ordering, anticipating future needs and trends. For instance, a company employing SCM might engage in demand forecasting, allowing for better plan-ning and inventory management. This proactive approach helps prevent stockouts, reduce costs, and enhance overall supply chain efficiency.

Moreover, traditional procurement often involves silo working, where different departments operate independently. The procurement team may not collaborate closely with other departments like pro-duction or marketing. In SCM, there's an emphasis on cross-functional working, breaking down de-partmental barriers for a more integrated approach. For example, an SCM team might work closely with production to ensure materials are aligned with manufacturing schedules, fostering efficiency and minimizing disruptions.

Lastly, in traditional procurement, the relationship with suppliers is transactional -- focused solely on the exchange of goods for money. Conversely, SCM promotes collaborative relationships, emphasiz-ing long-term partnerships. A company using SCM might work closely with suppliers to improve processes, share information, and jointly address challenges. For instance, an SCM approach might involve collaborating with suppliers to implement just-in-time inventory systems, leading to cost savings and improved responsiveness.

In conclusion, the differences between traditional procurement and SCM are substantial and nu-anced. While a traditional procurement approach may suit smaller organizations with low-value and low-risk purchases, larger multinational companies with complex supply chains often find SCM more suitable. Understanding these differences allows companies to tailor their approach based on their unique circumstances, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and strategic alignment with organizational goals in the ever-evolving landscape of buying and supply chain management.

Tutor Notes

- This question is taken from learning outcome 1.1.1 (p2 onwards). The new study guide has drasti-cally simplified the information on this topic compared to the old syllabus (the table above comes from the old syllabus). This may be good news for students in that you don't need to know as much, but I do wonder if the study guide gives students enough 'content' to write an essay on the subject.

- If a question is to come up from LO 1.1 it would be likely be something like: definitions and dif-ferences between procurement and SCM, difference between a supply chain and a supply network, elements of SCM, or how to add value in the supply chain.

How to approach this question:

- There

are 4 sections to this essay, so before you start writing I'd make a couple of notes on each of the points. Then build those notes into separate paragraphs. Your notes may look like this:

How to manage the contract -- ensuring contract is fit for purpose, holding XYZ to their responsibilities, ensuring ABC are also fulfilling their responsibilities, issuing contract variations if required, planning for contingencies.

- How to manage the supplier -- ensure the right relationship is in place (transactional vs collaborative), communication -- open and honest, ensure there is mutual trust and understanding of each other's goals/ objectives.

- Ways of monitoring performance -- use KPIs / SLAs, Supplier Scorecard, Vendor Rating, feedback from customers

- How to add value for ABC -- increasing efficiencies (e.g. less product defects), improved quality, assisting with Value Engineering exercises, reduction in time and costs (e.g. through improved processes such as ordering), the supplier delivers 'extras' for ABC such as training to staff at no additional cost.

- Ensure each paragraph refers to Jan, ABC and XYZ. The question doesn't state what the businesses are buying/ selling so you can use this as an opportunity to provide examples: 'if ABC are procuring raw materials from XYZ such as metal, an effective way to manage performance would include .... If they are procuring a service, it may be more beneficial to use .... methodology'

Example Essay

Jan, the Contracts Manager at ABC Ltd, plays a pivotal role in ensuring the success of the recently awarded contract with XYZ Ltd. Efficient contract and supplier management involves careful planning, communication, performance monitoring, and the continuous addition of value. Here's how Jan can navigate these aspects:

In terms of contract management, Jan must ensure that the terms and conditions of the contract are 'fit for purpose,' aligning with the specific needs and complexity of the procurement. For instance, a simple goods procurement may necessitate a concise document, while more intricate projects like engineering endeavors may require a detailed contract such as a JCT or NEC contract. Additionally, Jan should vigilantly manage the contract during its lifespan, addressing any potential 'scope creep' that might necessitate amendments. If the contract lacks provisions for such changes, Jan may need to initiate the creation of a new contract to accommodate evolving needs

Clear delineation of responsibilities and contingencies is crucial in the contract to ensure accountability and preparedness for unforeseen circumstances. The inclusion of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and damage clauses, where appropriate, adds a layer of clarity and accountability to the contractual relationship. Planning for contingencies involves having backup strategies in place, especially considering potential challenges that may arise during the collaboration with XYZ Ltd. For example, having other suppliers she can call upon if XYZ fail to deliver on an order.

Turning to supplier management, Jan's role involves fostering a positive and productive relationship with XYZ Ltd. This includes regular meetings to discuss progress, achievements, and future plans. A mobilization meeting is particularly important to ensure a strong start to the contract. Subsequent monthly or quarterly meetings provide a platform to review performance retrospectively and plan for the future. Additionally, effective communication is paramount, with Jan ensuring that both organizations regularly communicate, particularly regarding urgent issues that may require immediate attention. This proactive communication can occur through various channels, such as email or phone calls, facilitating a swift resolution of any emerging concerns.

Trust and honesty form the bedrock of the relationship between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd. Jan should work towards fostering mutual trust through both formal and informal activities, recognizing the importance of a transparent and cooperative partnership

In terms of performance monitoring, Jan can employ Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to track performance regularly. These metrics should not be viewed as one-off activities but rather as ongoing tools for assessing and ensuring that performance aligns with expectations. Clear communication regarding the consequences of failing to meet these targets, such as the implementation of a Performance Improvement Plan or potential contract cancellation, is essential for maintaining accountability. Regular performance meetings between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd provide an opportunity to discuss achievements, setbacks, and any necessary adjustments. Beyond quantitative metrics, surveys and feedback from customers can provide qualitative insights into performance.

Finally, Jan can contribute to the partnership's success by focusing on adding value. This involves going above and beyond the contractual obligations, such as delivering products more efficiently at no additional cost or improving operational efficiencies. Encouraging XYZ Ltd to participate in Value Engineering exercises and engaging in Early Supplier Involvement to shape and define future requirements would be a good example of this. Additionally, providing 'add-ons' or 'extras' outside the contractual framework, such as training for ABC Ltd staff, further enhances the value derived from the partnership.

In conclusion, Jan's role as Contracts Manager extends beyond the initial awarding of a contract- rather her role involves strategic contract and supplier management throughout the lifetime of the professional relationship. By ensuring the contract is well-suited for its purpose, fostering a positive relationship with the supplier, monitoring performance effectively, and consistently adding value, Jan contributes to the success of the collaboration between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd. This comprehensive approach sets the stage for a mutually beneficial and enduring partnership.

Tutor Notes:

- A case study question like this in the real exam is likely to come with more details. They often come with lots and lots of details to be honest, talking about what XYZ supplies to ABC and the names of the people involved. The case study usually gives you some good clues as to what the examiner will be looking for you to include, so do read them carefully.

- You don't have to include much 'theory' on case study questions -- the important thing is to reference Jan as much as possible. BUT you could throw in a cheeky mention of the Kraljic matrix. The approach to managing the contract and supplier would depend on the type of item supplied by XYZ -- e.g. if it is a bottleneck item the supplier may need to be handled differently to if it is a routine item. You could also mention KPIs and objectives as being 'SMART' - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-Bound

- study guide p.86-90 / p.94 / p.96 -98