What may be a compelling reason to go against technology best-practices in the SES Complete architecture?
In certain situations, deviating from technology best practices in the SES Complete architecture may be justified to satisfy a compelling business requirement. These requirements could include specific compliance mandates, unique operational needs, or regulatory obligations that necessitate custom configurations or an unconventional approach to implementation. While best practices provide a robust foundation, they may need adjustment when critical business needs outweigh standard technology recommendations.
SES Complete Implementation Curriculum emphasizes the importance of aligning technology solutions with business goals, even if this occasionally requires tailored adjustments to the recommended architecture to fulfill essential business objectives.
What are the main phases within the Symantec SES Complete implementation Framework?
The main phases within the Symantec SES Complete Implementation Framework are Assess, Design, Implement, and Manage. Each phase represents a critical step in the SES Complete deployment process:
Assess: Understand the current environment, gather requirements, and identify security needs.
Design: Develop the Solution Design and Configuration to address the identified needs.
Implement: Deploy and configure the solution based on the designed plan.
Manage: Ongoing management, monitoring, and optimization of the deployed solution.
These phases provide a structured methodology for implementing SES Complete effectively, ensuring that each step aligns with organizational objectives and security requirements.
SES Complete Implementation Curriculum outlines these phases as core components for a successful deployment and management lifecycle of the SES Complete solution.
An organization has several remote locations with minimum bandwidth and would like to use a content distribution method that does NOT involve configuring an internal LiveUpdate server. What content distribution method should be utilized?
For an organization with remote locations and minimal bandwidth that wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using a Group Update Provider (GUP) is the best choice.
Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.
No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (External LiveUpdate) would involve each client connecting to Symantec's servers, which could strain bandwidth.
Option B (Management Server) directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.
Option C (Intelligent Updater) is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.
Thus, the Group Update Provider is the optimal solution for remote locations with limited bandwidth that do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.
Which two options are available when configuring DNS change detected for SONAR? (Select two.)
When configuring DNS change detection for SONAR, two available options are Block and Log. These options allow administrators to define how SONAR should respond to unexpected or suspicious DNS changes.
Block: This option enables SONAR to immediately block DNS changes that it detects as potentially malicious, preventing suspicious DNS redirections that could expose endpoints to threats like phishing or malware sites.
Log: Selecting Log allows SONAR to record DNS changes without taking direct action. This option is useful for monitoring purposes, providing a record of changes for further analysis.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option B (Active Response) and Option C (Quarantine) are generally associated with threat responses but are not specific to DNS change detection.
Option E (Trace) is not an available response option for DNS changes in SONAR.
Therefore, the correct options for configuring DNS change detected for SONAR are Block and Log.
What is the final task during the project close-out meeting?
The final task during the project close-out meeting is to obtain a formal sign-off of the engagement. This step officially marks the completion of the project, confirming that all deliverables have been met to the customer's satisfaction.
Formal Closure: Obtaining sign-off provides a documented confirmation that the project has been delivered as agreed, closing the engagement formally and signifying mutual agreement on completion.
Transition to Support: Once sign-off is received, the customer is transitioned to standard support services, and the project team's responsibilities officially conclude.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (acknowledging achievements) and Option D (discussing support activities) are valuable but do not finalize the project.
Option B (handing over documentation) is part of the wrap-up but does not formally close the engagement.
Therefore, obtaining a formal sign-off is the final and essential task to conclude the project close-out meeting.
