According to the result from [The Governance Board - Blue Prism Community Site], HR Representatives would not typically be a stakeholder in an RPA Governance Board. The RPA Governance Board is responsible for setting the strategy for RPA and delivering against that strategy. It also oversees the demand management, benefits realization, program steering, and continuous improvement of RPA initiatives. Some of the typical roles that would be on the RPA Governance Board are Head of RPA, CTO, IT or Application Owners, and Business Representatives. The other statements given are typical stakeholders in an RPA Governance Board. Reference: [The Governance Board - Blue Prism Community Site]

According to the result fromThe Governance Board - Blue Prism Community Site, some of the typical roles that would be on the RPA Governance Board are Head of RPA, CTO, IT or Application Owners, and Business Representatives. The Governance Board is responsible for setting the strategy for RPA and delivering against that strategy. It also oversees the demand management, benefits realization, program steering, and continuous improvement of RPA initiatives. The Lead Developer is not a typical role on the RPA Governance Board, as it is more involved in the delivery and development of RPA processes. Reference:The Governance Board - Blue Prism Community Site

According to the result fromROBOTIC OPERATING MODEL - SS&C Blue Prism, one of the key success factors for RPA is to drive cultural adoption of the digital workforce across the organization. This can be achieved by building relationships with business areas by asking what they can do for them, and ensuring that the RPA vision and brand support that of the organization's vision and branding. Making automation mandatory or building a unique brand within the organization may create resistance or confusion among the stakeholders. Reference:ROBOTIC OPERATING MODEL - SS&C Blue Prism

According to the result fromProcess Delivery Methodology Document - Blue Prism Portal, the best description of the Regression Testing phase of the Blue Prism Testing Approach is that it ensures that the changes made to a process or object works, but also that any unchanged, but related objects or processes still work as expected. Regression Testing is performed after any change or update to a process or object, to verify that there are no adverse effects on the existing functionality or performance. The other statements given describe other phases of the Blue Prism Testing Approach, such as Development Testing, User Acceptance Testing, or Environment Testing. Reference:Process Delivery Methodology Document - Blue Prism Portal

According to the result from [Roles and Responsibilities of Blue Prism Developer - ], all of the statements given are benefits of the franchise model. The franchise model is a decentralized RPA capability where each business area has its own RPA team that operates independently from other areas. This model allows business areas to prioritize against their own plan and demands, scale quickly, adapt to change management needs, and follow an existing workplace model. Reference: [Roles and Responsibilities of Blue Prism Developer - ]