At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the BCS PDP9 exam questions by BCS. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the BCS Practitioner Certificate in Data Protection exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by BCS in their BCS PDP9 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their BCS Practitioner Certificate in Data Protection exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the BCS PDP9 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
When does a personal data breach need to be reported to a supervisory authority?
Article 33 of the UK GDPR requires controllers to notify the supervisory authority of a personal data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, unless the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. This means that not all personal data breaches need to be reported to the supervisory authority, only those that pose a risk to individuals. The risk should be assessed in terms of the potential negative consequences for individuals, such as discrimination, identity theft, fraud, financial loss, damage to reputation, loss of confidentiality, or any other significant economic or social disadvantage. The UK GDPR also requires controllers to communicate the personal data breach to the affected data subjects without undue delay, where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms. The other options are incorrect because:
The UK GDPR does not require all personal data breaches to be reported to the supervisory authority, only those that pose a risk to individuals. However, controllers must document all personal data breaches, regardless of whether they are reported or not, as part of their accountability obligations.
The UK GDPR does not make a distinction between personal data and special category data when it comes to reporting personal data breaches. Special category data is a type of personal data that reveals racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, or that concerns health, sex life or sexual orientation, or biometric or genetic data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person. The processing of special category data is subject to stricter conditions and safeguards under the UK GDPR, but the reporting of personal data breaches involving such data is subject to the same criteria as any other personal data breach, namely the risk to individuals.
The UK GDPR does not provide an exemption from reporting personal data breaches based on the controller's right of freedom of expression. The right of freedom of expression is a fundamental right that is recognised and protected by the UK GDPR, but it is not an absolute right that overrides the rights and freedoms of data subjects. The UK GDPR allows Member States to provide for exemptions or derogations from certain provisions of the UK GDPR for the processing of personal data carried out for journalistic purposes or the purpose of academic, artistic or literary expression, where such exemptions or derogations are necessary to reconcile the right to the protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information. However, these exemptions or derogations do not apply to the obligation to report personal data breaches to the supervisory authority, unless the Member State law specifies otherwise.Reference:
UK GDPR, Article 34
UK GDPR, Article 9
UK GDPR, Article 85
What is the meaning of storage limitation in relation to UK GDPR Article 5 (1 )(e)?
Storage limitation is one of the principles of data protection under the UK GDPR. It means that personal data should not be kept in a form that allows identification of data subjects for longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data are processed. The UK GDPR does not specify any fixed time limits for different types of data, but rather requires data controllers to determine and justify the appropriate retention periods for their processing activities, taking into account factors such as the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing, the risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, and the legal obligations and expectations of the data controller. Data controllers should also have a policy setting out standard retention periods where possible, and review the data they hold regularly to ensure that it is erased or anonymised when it is no longer needed. Data subjects have the right to request the erasure of their personal data if the data controller no longer has a lawful basis or a legitimate interest for keeping it. The UK GDPR allows for some exceptions to the storage limitation principle, such as when the personal data is processed solely for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes, or statistical purposes, subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects.Reference:
UK GDPR, Article 5 (1) (e) and (2)4
ICO Guide to Data Protection, Storage Limitation7
An individual applies for a job as a security guard The employer has had significant issues with the sickness record of past recruits They therefore decide to offer the position to the individual on the basis they request a copy of their medical record so that the employer can be assured that they are in a good state of health.
The Data Protection Officer has been asked to advise. What advice is MOST appropriate?
The Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) makes it a criminal offence for a person to require another person to make a subject access request for information about their health, convictions or cautions, or spent convictions, and to provide that information to the first person or a third person, as a condition of providing or offering to provide goods, facilities or services, or as a condition of entering into or continuing a contract. This is known as an enforced subject access request. The employer in this scenario is committing a criminal offence by offering the job to the individual on the condition that they request a copy of their medical record and provide it to the employer. The employer is also breaching the data protection principles of lawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, and storage limitation, as they are processing health data, which is a special category of personal data, without a valid legal basis, without informing the individual of the purpose and legal basis of the processing, and without limiting the processing to what is necessary and relevant for the employment relationship. The employer should instead obtain the individual's explicit consent to request the health information directly from the relevant health professional, and only request the information that is necessary and proportionate for the specific role of a security guard.Reference:
ICO guidance on enforced subject access requests4
ICO guidance on special category data5
A privacy notice MUST NOT contain
the identity and contact details of the controller and, where applicable, the controller's representative and the data protection officer;
the purposes and legal basis of the processing;
the categories of personal data concerned;
the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, including any third parties or international organisations;
where applicable, the fact that the controller intends to transfer personal data to a third country or international organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means by which to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available;
the period for which the personal data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;
the existence of the rights of the data subject, such as the right to access, rectify, erase, restrict, object or port the data, and the conditions or limitations on those rights;
the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, where the processing is based on consent;
the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority;
whether the provision of personal data is a statutory or contractual requirement, or a requirement necessary to enter into a contract, as well as whether the data subject is obliged to provide the personal data and of the possible consequences of failure to provide such data;
the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, and meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.
A privacy notice does not need to contain details of the processor's staff, as this is not relevant or necessary for the data subject to understand how their personal data is processed. However, the controller may need to inform the data subject if their personal data is shared with a processor, and provide the identity and contact details of the processor, as part of the information on the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data.Reference:
Article 13 and 14 of the UK GDPR5
Which of the following statements MOST accurately describes why a risk-based approach to the use of Al is necessary?
