A customer requests an order of 100 units in Period 1. The master schedule for the item indicates an available-to-promise
(ATP) of 85 units for Period 1. Which of the following approaches is the most appropriate course of action?
The most appropriate course of action when the customer requests an order of 100 units in Period 1, but the ATP is only 85 units, is to promise the 85 units in Period 1 and the remaining 15 units in the next possible ATP period. This way, the customer can receive a partial fulfillment of their order as soon as possible, and the rest of their order when more inventory becomes available. This approach also avoids overpromising or underdelivering, which can damage customer relationships and satisfaction.
The other options are not appropriate, because they either violate the master schedule, ignore the component availability, or disadvantage another customer. Increasing the MPS quantity in Period 1 by 15 units may not be feasible or desirable, because it may disrupt the production plan, increase costs, or create capacity issues. Promising the 100 units, and then checking on component availability may result in a failure to deliver, if the components are not available or sufficient. Promising the 100 units by removing 15 units from another customer's order with a smaller revenue value may be unethical or unfair, and may also cause dissatisfaction or complaints from the other customer.
One way to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain is to:
The other options are not effective ways to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain. Negotiating lower component cost may reduce the procurement expenses, but it may also compromise the quality and safety of the components, which may increase the liability risk. Pushing inventory to supplier locations may reduce the inventory carrying costs and risks, but it may also increase the dependency and vulnerability on the suppliers, which may expose the company to more liability risk. Using LTL shipments more frequently may reduce the transportation costs and emissions, but it may also increase the handling and damage risks of the products, which may affect the customer satisfaction and liability.
An advantage of activity-based costing (ABC) is:
Activity-based costing (ABC) is a method of allocating costs to products or services based on the activities that consume resources in the production or delivery process. ABC identifies the cost drivers, which are the factors that cause or influence the amount of resources used for each activity. ABC then assigns costs to products or services based on the amount of cost drivers they use. An advantage of ABC is that it uses cost drivers to allocate costs to products, which provides a more accurate and realistic picture of the cost structure and profitability of each product or service. ABC helps to identify the value-added and non-value-added activities, and to eliminate or reduce the waste and inefficiency in the process. ABC does not allow raw material costs to be allocated on a per unit basis, as raw material costs are usually considered as direct costs that can be traced to each product or service. ABC does not make it easier to establish standard costs, which are the predetermined or expected costs of producing or delivering a product or service. ABC does not enable overhead costs to be allocated evenly across all products, as overhead costs are the indirect costs that cannot be traced to each product or service. ABC allocates overhead costs based on the cost drivers, which may vary for different products or services.Reference: CPIM Exam Content Manual Version 7.0, Domain 8: Manage Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement Concepts, p. 46; Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Definition; Activity-based costing.
The most relevant measure of customer service performance is:
Customer service performance is the degree to which a product or service meets or exceeds customer expectations. The most relevant measure of customer service performance is how the customer perceives the service compared to what they expected. This measure reflects the customer's satisfaction and loyalty, which are key factors for business success. Other measures, such as service promised versus measured, customer complaints, or positive feedback, are more related to the supplier's perspective and may not capture the customer's true perception of service quality.Reference: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Domain 3: Plan and Manage Demand, Section A: Demand Management, Subsection 4: Customer Service Management, Page 11.