At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Adobe AD0-E906 exam questions by Adobe. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Adobe Workfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector Expert exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Adobe in their Adobe AD0-E906 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Adobe Workfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector Expert exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Adobe AD0-E906 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
A user is reviewing a proof of a legal document that requires multiple approvals. There are several Images in the proof, all of which conform to the brand standards laid out by the organization. As the user works through the proof, the changes required all relate to written copy.
How should the user efficiently highlight and provide comments?
In this case, since the user is reviewing a legal document where all changes are related to written copy, the most efficient way to highlight and provide comments is by using the Text Select tool. This tool allows the user to select specific text in the document and attach comments directly related to the text, making it easier for others to understand the context of the feedback.
The Text Select tool is specifically designed for making text-based comments, which is ideal for written copy changes.
Options A (Freehand tool) and B (Box tool) are better suited for graphical annotations or drawing attention to areas of images, not text-specific feedback.
For more details, refer to Workfront Proofing documentation on proofing tools and their use cases.
A developer created a custom metadata profile and assigned default values to some fields. The developer applied this custom profile to a folder in the DAM that already uses a different metadata profile. When viewing the metadata properties of the existing assets in a subfolder, the developer noticed that the custom metadata profile was not applied to these assets.
What is causing this issue?
When a new metadata profile is applied to a folder in AEM, it only affects new assets added to that folder after the profile is applied. Existing assets that were already in the folder or subfolders prior to the profile being assigned will retain the metadata profile that was previously applied.
To update the metadata of existing assets with the new profile, you would need to either manually update the assets or run a script to reapply the metadata profile to those assets.
Option B is incorrect because the profile applies to all assets in the folder, not just direct children. Option C is incorrect because if there were invalid field values, you would likely see an error or warning, rather than a silent failure.
For more details, refer to AEM's documentation on managing and applying metadata profiles.
A custom field needs to be mapped in AEM metadata mapping the field details are below:
Label - Creative Manager
Name - managerCreative Description
The resource assigned the creative manager role
How is the field from Workfront referenced in AEM?
In Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), when mapping metadata fields from Workfront, custom form fields are referenced using the CUSTOM FORMS prefix followed by the internal name of the field. In this case:
The Label is 'Creative Manager'
The Name is 'managerCreative,' which is the internal field name in Workfront.
To reference this field in AEM metadata, you need to use the CUSTOM FORMS: prefix followed by the field's name, making the correct reference CUSTOM FORMS: managerCreative. This ensures that AEM can correctly pull the metadata value from Workfront when syncing or using the Workfront enhanced connector for AEM.
Options A and B are incorrect because they either lack the proper formatting or are incomplete.
For more details on this configuration, you can refer to Adobe Workfront's enhanced connector documentation for AEM, particularly around metadata mapping and field referencing practices.
A custom field must be created to represent the Creative Manager and allow the selection of an existing resource name in the Workfront application Which type of field and object type should be selected?
The requirement is to allow users to select a resource (Creative Manager) from a list of existing users in the Workfront application. The appropriate solution is to use a Typeahead field with the User object type.
Field type - Typeahead: This field allows users to start typing the name of an individual, and the system will auto-suggest matching users from the Workfront database. This is ideal for scenarios where you need to assign a specific role, like a Creative Manager, from a list of existing users.
Object type - User: By using the User object type, the field will link directly to Workfront's user directory, ensuring that the selection is limited to valid, active resources in the system.
This combination of field and object type is the most efficient for assigning roles based on existing users, as it prevents errors and ensures data consistency by utilizing Workfront's internal user directory.
Options B and C are not suitable because a calculated field is not required, and checkboxes do not allow selection from a list of user names.
For further reference, consult the Custom Fields and Typeahead Fields sections in Workfront's documentation, which outline how to configure these fields to enable user selection from the organization's resource pool.
A customer wants to support translations on AEM Cloud Service environment. They have an existing third party vendor who will provide a pre-build package that must be deployed to AEM so it can be leveraged as port of the workflow process.
How should the developer deploy this third party library onto AEM Cloud Service?
In Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) as a Cloud Service, deployments are handled through Cloud Manager, and all code, including third-party libraries, must be part of the versioned code repository. To deploy the third-party package provided by the vendor, it needs to be included as part of the AEM project's codebase under the install folder within the repository:
The package should be stored in the <url>file;$(maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory)/install</url> directory.
Once stored, the deployment will be handled through Cloud Manager's deployment pipeline.
This ensures the third-party package is included in the standard deployment process and follows AEMaaCS's immutable infrastructure model, which ensures that changes to environments are made only through deployments using Cloud Manager.
Option B is incorrect because installing a package directly to production via CRX Package Manager is not allowed in AEM as a Cloud Service. Option C would work for self-hosted AEM instances but not for AEMaaCS, where dependencies must be part of the Maven build.
For more information, refer to AEMaaCS deployment best practices and the Cloud Manager documentation.
