At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Adobe AD0-E902 exam questions by Adobe. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer Professional exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Adobe in their Adobe AD0-E902 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer Professional exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Adobe AD0-E902 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Which two features or modules can be used to create conditional or nested error handling when using Error Handling Directives? (Choose two.)
In Adobe Workfront Fusion, error handling directives are used to manage and respond to errors during scenario execution. These directives allow the implementation of conditional or nested error handling mechanisms, ensuring workflows can adapt and recover from unexpected issues efficiently. Among the features and modules provided by Fusion:
Filters:
Filters are essential components in Workfront Fusion. They allow you to define specific conditions to control the flow of data between modules.
They enable conditional processing by allowing or restricting the passage of data based on defined criteria, which is fundamental for creating dynamic and conditional workflows.
When used with error handling, filters can evaluate whether certain data meets criteria to determine alternative pathways, thus enabling conditional error handling.
Routers:
Routers split the execution of a scenario into multiple branches based on specific conditions.
Each branch can be configured to handle different error types or conditions, allowing nested error handling and custom error recovery paths.
They are particularly useful when you need to define distinct responses for various error cases within a single scenario.
Eliminated Options:
A . Text Parser: While text parsers process and extract data from strings, they are not directly involved in error handling within scenarios.
C . Workfront App: The Workfront app is primarily for interacting with Workfront features and functionalities, not directly related to error handling within Fusion scenarios.
Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Error Handling Directives Overview
Adobe Workfront Community: Filters and Routers in Conditional Logic Workflows
Experience League Documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com
A global customer has end users who input date and currency data into fields in inconsistent formats. Despite continued training efforts, this continues to be an issue. Unfortunately, the third-party service that the end users are using does not support forcing a required field format. These input mistakes do not happen frequently, but they currently stop the scenario from executing after the default three retries.
In Fusion, which action can the admin take to ensure that errors are corrected after they occur in a scenario?
Understanding the Scenario:
The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
Why Option A is Correct:
Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling 'Store incomplete executions' in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
Why Option B is Incorrect:
The 'switch module' can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
Why Option C is Incorrect:
Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Open the Scenario Settings by clicking the gear icon.
Enable the option Store Incomplete Executions under Execution settings.
Save the settings and activate the scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs. Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions
Refer to the exhibit.
In a scenario, there are two aggregators displaying different numbers in the bundle inspector: Aggregator 1 displays a 1, and Aggregator 2 displays a 10. What is a possible reason for this difference?
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
Understanding the Scenario:
The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).
The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.
Option Analysis:
A . Aggregator 1's route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles:
Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration. While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator's configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.
B . The source module for the aggregators are different:
Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from 'Projects,' which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from 'Issues,' which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.
C . Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:
Incorrect. Aggregators do not 'repeat' a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.
D . The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:
Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., 'Projects' to Aggregator 1 and 'Issues' to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router's configuration alone.
Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:
Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.
In this example, 'Projects' might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while 'Issues' outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).
How to Verify:
Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.
Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.
Reference: This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion's handling of bundles and aggregation logic. Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.
A solution requested for a use case requires that the scenario is initiated with project updates.
Which Workfront app module will start the scenario immediately?
Understanding the Questio n:
The scenario must begin as soon as a project update occurs in Adobe Workfront.
The correct Workfront module should continuously monitor for specific changes (in this case, project updates) and trigger the scenario immediately.
Why Option A ('Watch Events') is Correct:
Watch Events Module: This module in Adobe Workfront Fusion is specifically designed to monitor events, such as updates to projects, tasks, or issues, and trigger scenarios as soon as those events occur.
Real-Time Triggering: The 'Watch Events' module listens to the Workfront event stream and ensures the scenario starts immediately upon detecting relevant updates.
Example Use Case: Monitoring updates to a project's status, such as changes in 'Completion' or 'Progress,' to trigger notifications or integrations with other systems.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ('Watch Record'): This module monitors specific Workfront records (e.g., projects, tasks, issues) for new additions or modifications, but it does not initiate scenarios immediately when updates occur. It works better for periodic checks rather than real-time events.
Option C ('Watch Field'): This module monitors changes to specific fields within a Workfront object, but it is not designed for broader event monitoring like project updates. It is more suited for field-specific tracking.
Option D ('Search'): This module performs queries to find specific data in Workfront (e.g., searching for projects based on criteria), but it is not an event-driven module and does not automatically trigger scenarios.
Steps to Configure the Watch Events Module in Workfront Fusion:
In the Fusion scenario editor, add the Watch Events module as the first step in your scenario.
Configure the module:
Select Workfront Connection: Choose the authorized Workfront account.
Event Object: Specify the object type (e.g., Project, Task, Issue) to monitor.
Event Type: Select the type of event to watch, such as 'Update' or 'Change.'
Save and activate the scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
Using the Watch Events module ensures the scenario is event-driven and starts automatically when the desired project update occurs. This approach is both efficient and timely, meeting the requirement for immediate initiation.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Watch Events Module
Workfront Community Forum: Use Cases for Watch Events
What are two required elements of a test case? (Choose two.)
A . Expected Outcome of Test
A test case must clearly state what the expected outcome is, providing a standard against which the results can be measured.
This ensures testers can validate whether the scenario behaves as intended.
C . Clear Procedure for Completing the Test
A well-defined procedure outlines the exact steps required to execute the test, ensuring consistent and repeatable testing.
This reduces ambiguity and helps identify whether errors are due to the scenario configuration or improper test execution.
Why Not Other Options?
B . Name of Test Owner: While helpful for accountability, the name of the test owner is not a required component of the test case itself.
D . Source Code Being Tested: Fusion scenarios do not typically involve source code. Instead, the focus is on workflow execution and configuration, making this element irrelevant.
Workfront Training Materials: Test Case Design Best Practices
Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Testing and Debugging Scenarios
