At ValidExamDumps, we consistently monitor updates to the Adobe AD0-E902 exam questions by Adobe. Whenever our team identifies changes in the exam questions,exam objectives, exam focus areas or in exam requirements, We immediately update our exam questions for both PDF and online practice exams. This commitment ensures our customers always have access to the most current and accurate questions. By preparing with these actual questions, our customers can successfully pass the Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer Professional exam on their first attempt without needing additional materials or study guides.
Other certification materials providers often include outdated or removed questions by Adobe in their Adobe AD0-E902 exam. These outdated questions lead to customers failing their Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer Professional exam. In contrast, we ensure our questions bank includes only precise and up-to-date questions, guaranteeing their presence in your actual exam. Our main priority is your success in the Adobe AD0-E902 exam, not profiting from selling obsolete exam questions in PDF or Online Practice Test.
Given the array below, a user wants a comma-separated string of all stat names.
What is the correct expression?
A.
B.
C.
D.
Understanding the Requirement:
The input is an array containing objects, and the goal is to extract all the stat.name values into a comma-separated string.
Example Input:
[
{
'base_stat': 48,
'effort': 1,
'stat': {
'name': 'hp',
'url': 'https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/stat/1/'
}
},
{
'base_stat': 48,
'effort': 0,
'stat': {
'name': 'attack',
'url': 'https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/stat/2/'
}
}
]
Example Output: 'hp, attack'
Why Option B is Correct:
The expression join(map(2.data: stats[]; stats.stat.name); ', '):
map: Iterates through each object in the array (2.data: stats[]) and extracts the stat.name field.
join: Combines the extracted values into a single string, separated by a comma and space (', ').
Breaking it down:
map(2.data: stats[]; stats.stat.name) Creates an array of names: ['hp', 'attack'].
join(...; ', ') Converts the array into the string 'hp, attack'.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A: join(2.data: stats[]; stat.name; ', ')
This syntax is incorrect because it attempts to directly access stat.name within the join function without first mapping the values.
Option C: join(map(2.data: stats[]; stat.name); ', ')
The mapping references stat.name directly but does not account for the nested structure (stats.stat.name).
Option D: join(flatten(2.data: stats[]); ', ')
The flatten function is unnecessary here as the data is already structured. It would not properly extract the stat.name values.
Steps to Implement in Workfront Fusion:
Add a Mapping/Transformation Module.
Use the join(map(...)) function as described to transform the input array into a comma-separated string.
Test the output to ensure it correctly generates the desired format.
How This Solves the Problem:
The map function ensures the proper extraction of nested stat.name values.
The join function combines these values into the desired format efficiently.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using Map and Join Functions
The combination of map and join ensures that the stat names are extracted and formatted into a single comma-separated string, as required.
A Fusion user notices that a third-party web service is sometimes returning a connection error -"
"service is not reachable". However, the module executes successfully a few minutes later in a new execution.
Which action increases the success rate of the executions?
When dealing with intermittent errors, such as 'service is not reachable,' the default error handling in Adobe Workfront Fusion is often sufficient to improve execution success rates.
Default Error Handling:
Fusion automatically retries operations when transient errors, such as network or connection issues, occur.
By leveraging this built-in functionality, the system will attempt to re-execute the failing module after a brief delay, which is often enough for the external service to become reachable again.
Why Not Other Options?
A . Adding an error handler that will notify the system owner: While notifying the owner can be useful for monitoring purposes, it does not directly address improving the success rate of executions.
C . Adding a Break directive to the module: Adding a Break directive will stop the execution entirely, which is counterproductive in this case, as the service typically becomes reachable again after a short time.
Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Default Error Handling Mechanisms
Experience League Community: Managing Intermittent API Errors in Fusion
A Fusion Developer receives frequent notifications that a specific Scenario has been stopped. Upon investigation, the developer notes that there is nothing wrong with the data or process in the scenario, but that the error always occurs on a specific module that calls a third-party system. The error recorded is consistently a service unavailable error, particularly during times of high network traffic to the target system.
Which action should the Fusion Developer take to reduce the number of times the scenario is automatically stopped by Fusion?
In this scenario, the error consistently arises due to the unavailability of a third-party service during high traffic times. This is a temporary issue and does not indicate a problem with the data or process. The recommended approach in such cases is to configure the scenario to retry failed executions:
Update Scenario Settings:
In Workfront Fusion, you can configure scenarios to automatically retry a failed execution.
This option ensures that temporary issues, like service unavailability, are retried after a delay, reducing the chances of the scenario being stopped permanently.
This is particularly useful when dealing with network traffic spikes or third-party API throttling.
Why Not Other Options?
B . Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions: Ignoring failed executions would cause incomplete or incorrect data to flow through the scenario, leading to potential downstream issues.
C . Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive: While error handlers are useful, the Break directive stops the scenario from processing further, which is not ideal for a temporary issue.
D . Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater: Adding a repeater increases complexity and is unnecessary when the retry option is already available in scenario settings.
Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Scenario Settings and Error Handling
Experience League Community: Handling API Rate Limits and Errors in Workfront Fusion
Refer to the exhibit.
In this image,
all items are displayed in a position that does not hide their execution sequence. In what order do the modules execute?
Understanding the Diagram:
The image depicts a Workfront Fusion scenario using Routers to split and manage multiple execution paths.
Fusion executes modules in a left-to-right and top-to-bottom sequence along each path. Routers direct the flow to downstream modules.
Determining the Execution Sequence:
Path 1:
The first path begins with Google Drive. The Router branches out, directing execution sequentially to other modules.
Path 2:
The second path starts with Email and continues downwards through the remaining modules.
Order Within Branches:
After passing through a Router, each branch completes its sequence of modules before moving to the next Router.
Why Option D is Correct:
Execution begins from the leftmost module (Google Drive) and flows rightward. The sequence is as follows:
Google Drive
Data Store
Workfront
Salesforce
This matches the visual layout and Fusion's execution rules for scenarios with Routers.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ('Google Drive > Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce'):
Incorrect because Workfront does not precede Data Store in the execution order.
Option B ('Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce > Google Drive'):
Incorrect because execution begins with Google Drive, not Email.
Option C ('Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce'):
Incorrect because it excludes Google Drive as the starting point and places modules out of sequence.
Execution Rules in Workfront Fusion:
Fusion executes modules in the order they appear visually, starting from left to right and top to bottom within each branch.
Routers split the execution into separate branches, which are completed sequentially.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Execution Flow Rules
Workfront Community: Understanding Router and Module Execution
The correct execution sequence is Google Drive > Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce, ensuring all paths are processed as per the scenario's layout.
To meet compliance standards, a user must include a process that tracks every Workfront project update created by Fusion.
What can they do to address this business requirement?
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
Problem Summary:
The organization requires a process to track every project update made by Fusion to meet compliance standards.
This process must provide a clear audit trail of updates, including details like user and timestamp.
Option Analysis:
A . Use reporting on the Last Updated by ID and Last Update Date:
While this provides basic reporting, it only reflects the most recent update and does not maintain a comprehensive history of changes over time.
B . Update the External Reference ID with User ID and Timestamp:
Updating the External Reference ID could cause issues if this field is used for other purposes. It is not designed for logging multiple updates.
C . Create a Note record related to the record updated:
Correct. Creating a Note record for each update ensures that every change is logged with relevant details (e.g., user, timestamp, update reason). This approach creates a full audit trail that is easily accessible and reportable.
Why Note Records are Best:
Audit Trail: Notes provide a clear and searchable history of updates for each project.
Compliance: Ensures compliance by documenting who made what changes and when.
Flexibility: Notes can include custom details such as update reasons or additional context, making them more robust than standard fields.
Implementation:
In the Fusion scenario, add a module to create a Note record after each update.
Populate the Note with relevant details, such as:
User ID ({lastUpdatedBy})
Timestamp ({lastUpdateDate})
Description of the change.
